Posted on 01/20/2023 10:09:00 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The individual responsible for leaking the U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade remains unidentified, according to a recently released report.
In a statement issued on Thursday, the Supreme Court announced that its investigation “has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.”
Last May, a draft opinion in the case Dobbs v. Jackson, which ended up striking down Roe by concluding that abortion was not a constitutional right, was leaked to the public. This is believed to be the first time a Supreme Court ruling was made known to the public before its official release. This led to condemnation from Chief Justice John Roberts, and an investigation was launched.
“The Chief Justice assigned the task to the Marshal of the Supreme Court and her staff. After months of diligent analysis of forensic evidence and interviews of almost 100 employees, the Marshal’s team determined that no further investigation was warranted with respect to many of the ‘82 employees [who] had access to electronic or hard copies of the draft opinion,’” the high court wrote in a statement.
“In following up on all available leads, however, the Marshal’s team performed additional forensic analysis and conducted multiple follow-up interviews of certain employees.”
The Supreme Court also noted that the marshal and her team of investigators “will continue to have our full support” in their ongoing search for the decision leaker.
The report quoted Michael Chertoff, who was asked by Roberts to independently review the investigation, who stated that “there were important insights gleaned from the investigation that can be acted upon to avoid future incidents.”
“Throughout my review, the investigators were transparent, cooperative, and available to answer my questions about the process,” stated Chertoff.
“The Court investigators will continue following up on leads if more information is learned. In the meantime, the Court has already taken steps to increase security and tighten controls regarding the handling of sensitive documents.”
On May 2, 2022, Politico released a leaked opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, which indicated that the Supreme Court would overturn the landmark 1973 decision Roe and the 1992 Supreme Court decision Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
The draft opinion leak caused outrage among pro-choice groups and activists, with a wave of protests and violence against pro-life churches and charities occurring in response.
This included demonstrations being held outside of the houses of Supreme Court justices and a security fence being constructed around the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C.
In June, shortly before the release of the finalized Dobbs opinion, a man was arrested near the house of Justice Brett Kavanaugh and was charged with attempting to murder the high court member.
Shortly after the leak, Roberts denounced the leak as a “betrayal of the confidences of the Court."
At an event hosted by the conservative think-tank The Heritage Foundation last October, Alito said the leak made him and other members of the Supreme Court “targets for assassination.”
“The leak also made those of us who were thought to be in the majority in support of overruling Roe and Casey targets for assassination, because it gave people a rational reason to think they could prevent that from happening by killing one of us,” Alito said.
Ping
It was them.
RE: It was them.
Who’s THEM?
I read that Roberts was against the ruling coming forward as to controversial and he may have leaked it to get it reversed. but who would suspect the Chief.
It was one of the justices. They know which one.
My money is on the Wide Latina.
“The Supreme Court still hasn’t found leaker of abortion ruling overturning Roe v. Wade”
Or have they found the leaker but don’t want to identify the perpetrator because it’s not an underling nobody?
We can track a serial killer from the Pacific Northwest to Pennsylvania, even pull video off a him being pulled over for a traffic violation along the way.
But a leaker within the USSC? Guess not. Calling BS on this.
The Wise Latina. They know.
Charge the news org.
Then charge the reporter of the news org.
Then offer the reporter plea deal to flip on his source.
Easy peasy.
Notice they use the words ‘ a”
“Individual”
” the “
When they all ready admitted the clerks told the spouses who obviously told the news.
Charge ALL of them.
“The Supreme Court has not found the leaker”
NOT true. They knew the leaker, perhaps have known for some time, and the means by which it was leaked. But the august presence of the Supreme Court must not be demeaned by revealing the name of the leaker, and it was by no means just some clerk or assistant. This was at a higher level.
No trail of e-mails, or anything written on a piece of paper. But a whispered conversation, and a moment of apparent “error”, the touch of the right keystroke, and “Oops!”
That genie was never going back into the bottle.
They lack the courage.
Its tough having a compromised Chief Justice....
I think they know who leaked it. But they do not want to announce it publicly.
That’s because it was one of the justices that leaked it.
Breyer.
9 Justices and there are 4 Clerks for each Justice = 45 individuals. Plus there are secretarial staff. A large number of suspects.
The focus seems to be on employees. If that’s the case, its not really a thorough investigation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.