Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi Blasts GOP Claim She Set ‘Precedent’ To Kick Dems Off Committees: ‘We Said If You’re A Danger, You’re A Danger!’
Mediaite ^ | Jan 20, 2023 | Tommy Christopher

Posted on 01/20/2023 7:43:55 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi objected when CNN anchor Chris Wallace asked if she’d “opened the door” for Republicans to kick Democratic members of Congress Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and Ilhan Omar off of their committees......

WALLACE: Didn’t you open the door to this?

PELOSI: No, we set a precedent which I hope they will follow. If they have members, as they did, who threatened the security of our members on the committee or a danger to our members, threatening them, then they will go off the committee. So if they have that accusation about any of our members, let’s hear what they have to say. It was clear that their members were a threat to our members. So this is about maintaining safety for our members. The fact that they want to take these people off the committee is philosophical. So, they have the votes they could take somebody off, but that’s for philosophical reasons. That’s not the precedent that we set. We said if you’re a danger, you’re a danger. You can’t be on the committee.

WALLACE: They would say Ilhan Omar has made a number of anti-semitic comments, they’d say Eric Swalwell had a relationship of some sort with an alleged Chinese spy. Those are legitimate reasons to kick them off their commitees.

PELOSI: Well, that’s not — there’s not legitimate reasons. If they want to do that, then that’s the precedent they are setting, but don’t say it’s a precedent that we set. We said these people are a danger to the other members of the committee and they’re threatening manner and the rest, and that’s why they’re going off the committee, because they’re a danger.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; housecommittees; nancy; payback; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: where's_the_Outrage?

It is laughable and actually slander to state publicly that Republicans Jim Jordan and Jim Banks were going to assault any people on the January 6th Committee.

If she had prior knowledge, she could have ordered their arrests. What she did was 100% political and now she’s bald-faced lying.

One or both of them need to sue this seahag for slander.


21 posted on 01/20/2023 8:29:31 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (Gov't declaring misinformation is tyranny: “Who determines what false information is?” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

OK, where does chrissy have a TV talk show that nancy peeloser was on?


22 posted on 01/20/2023 8:32:28 AM PST by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

She’s pretty clear - Being a threat to National security is fine.

Her stated concern is only with the safety of her party members.


23 posted on 01/20/2023 8:33:53 AM PST by whatexit (Biden is an unmanned drone. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Obviously, Nancy felt it was safe to do and interview with Chris Wallace.


24 posted on 01/20/2023 8:42:14 AM PST by Parley Baer (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I can’t think of much that’s more dangerous than having a guy who’s sleeping with a Chinese spy on the intelligence committee.


25 posted on 01/20/2023 8:46:14 AM PST by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

“ If they have members, as they did, who threatened the security of our members on the committee or a danger to our members, threatening them, then they will go off the committee. So if they have that accusation about any of our members, let’s hear what they have to say. ”

And we all remember when Nasty Pelosi went on national TV and explained her reason for excluding main stream republicans. /s/


26 posted on 01/20/2023 8:51:21 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryCrow
I can’t think of much that’s more dangerous than having a guy who’s sleeping with a Chinese spy on the intelligence committee.

How about a guy in charge of the nation's entire commercial aviation program who just happens to believe that he can grow two breasts and feed his "children" on them?

27 posted on 01/20/2023 8:55:00 AM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
‘We Said If You’re A Danger, You’re A Danger!’

Guess that means she would support removing 'Mad Maxine' from her committees...

;>)

28 posted on 01/20/2023 9:01:56 AM PST by Who is John Galt? ("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Nancy, you are the worst leadership danger this country has ever faced. You were born to epitomize the word despot.
29 posted on 01/20/2023 9:14:20 AM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

For once, Chrissy Wallace asks a fair question. And of course Pelosi can’t answer it. A “danger” to other committee members, what a joke!


30 posted on 01/20/2023 9:24:22 AM PST by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I swear Nanzi babbles almost as bad as KamalHo ...


31 posted on 01/20/2023 9:57:02 AM PST by ByteMercenary (Slo-Joe and KamalHo are not my leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
We are talking about 'The former Speaker of the House' and should refer to that braying jackass with that title every time she gets addressed.
32 posted on 01/20/2023 10:37:52 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Trump WON!!! He will win 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey
How about a guy in charge of the nation's entire commercial aviation program who just happens to believe that he can grow two breasts and feed his "children" on them?

That’s up there too

33 posted on 01/20/2023 12:04:31 PM PST by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

should restraining orders have been filed if they were so dangerous...


34 posted on 01/20/2023 12:35:12 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The MSM is slow on the up tick why do the bother asking a democrat a question they already know the answer they will get.

Report on their actions and results if they want facts.


35 posted on 01/20/2023 3:31:46 PM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson