Replies on the other thread about this indicate they’re likely just waiting on all the appeals still in play to be decided, before deciding if they actually need to weigh in, or not. Probably a good idea, to see what other legal theories might pop up as part of that process as well, before they have to rule.
I get it. There is likely a better case submitted to the Supreme Court that will also address the New York issues.
Don’t be discouraged.
Sounds like they just refused to hear it. In other words, it has to work its way up the chain through the lower courts first.
On the surface I would say that the magic words are “keep and bear arms”.
There was no mention of selling. Worse, there was no mention of making.
Hair splitting may carry the day in New York for the time being