“He was wrong on so much or this from the start.
IMO he is done politically.”
Maybe you should read the article and not the headline:
“Trump said that he “always” had concerns but argued that some “reports” were saying the vaccines were “the greatest thing that’s ever happened,” while those that claimed safety issues involved “relatively small numbers.””
Now, that is true, but a lot of us assume the negative reports were heavily censored.
All that shows is that he knows what he is promoting here is BS, but he won’t say it. Evil deception on his part, IMO.
That's because they were all censored, lost their licenses to practice, threatened! Banned from social media to try and get the word out.
That right there should have been a signal that something was wrong.
EXACTLY CORRECT.
The liar media have an agenda. They know beforehand what they're going to write. Catching up with Trump and asking a question is done just so they can say they interviewed him.
Whatever Trump says, the liar media is going to twist to their own ends.
For example, the title of the thread is:
Trump Dismisses COVID-19 Vax Safety Claims, Says He Saved 100 Million Lives
Note the words "Trump", "Dismisses", "Claims"
Look closely at what AILA SLISCO does:
AILA SLISCO's planned hit is carried out according to her Newsweek editors. AILA SLISCO wants the readers to scan over and retain the following impressions:
Trump is insensitive.
Trump is sticking to his lies.
Trump is incompetent.
You, the Reader, must never let Trump near the White House again!
After emphasizing statements inserted out of sequence, the agenda of branding Trump as a con artist, AILA SLISCO finally posts Trump’s answer to Brody's question:
There is no President in history that had the training and experience to argue with Pharma scientists about their tools, procedures, and developments. In an emergency Pandemic, there is no choice but to go with what top experts are recommending, because the alternative is to do nothing, then be blamed for millions of deaths.
DeSantis trolls will hit Trump as incompetent, but DeSantis was until November extolling how these vaccines saved lives.
So who are these experts advising that these vaxxes were safe and saving millions? Are certain batches good? Are others harmful?
There are real perpetrators out there that are hidden.
Who is AILA SLISCO? She's a liberal newbie to Newsweek.
Note: Biden is not asked these questions nor characterized as dismissing claims.
Here's how Biden is treated by Newsweek:
It should be noted that Biden also stated at another point in the same appearance that "If you're vaccinated, even if you do 'catch the virus'...you're not likely to get sick." This is a more accurate representation of scientific consensus on the vaccines at that point.
The scientific consensus since the start of the vaccine rollout has always been that the vaccines would not entirely prevent infection and those breakthrough infections such as Biden's will be possible even in people who have had booster shots.
Q. Why is Trump not "acknowledging" the harmful effects of Covid injections?
A. False question, he did acknowledge there were problems.
Q. Yes but, he's not angry and hurt like he should be.
A. He will come around when the evidence is admissible in court. Right now, it's premature.
Unlike you and me calling for heads to roll for the vaccine deaths, Trump has to wait because the 4th estate will crucify him if he doesn't have backup.
However, Trump can show he's aware that people are dying suddenly. He can say, as he said in the source here, that there are problems but the numbers are small. That's a true statement, but it will change as the numbers get worse.
In the next weeks and months, we can expect Trump to weigh in on the bad batch business. He can say we need to get to the bottom of who made those bad batches of vaccines.