[ClearCase_guy]

If any of it made Trump look bad, they would have released it already.
Therefore, they have 30 gigs of data that argues against their previous Narrative.

[Billthedrill]

The government is reviewing the material, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathryn Rakoczy said...

Well, that's a relief. "We said there's nothing to see here but we'll give it another look. Nope. Nothing to see." Who wouldn't trust that?

[SGCOS]

30g? that’s it? BS.. add a couple of 0’s and that would be a more accurate number

[DoughtyOne]

Justice Department Admits It has 30 Gigs of Data from
Jan. 6 Committee Uunseen by Public

What Justice Department?

That's not even a thing anymore.

[Boogieman]

‘“The government’s preliminary review of the materials has not revealed much beyond the transcripts of these dozen witnesses that appears relevant to the issues likely to arise in this trial,” Rakoczy said.’

Oh, is that how it works in discovery? The prosecution just decides for itself what might be relevant and withholds the rest of the evidence from the defense?

[rktman]

If it was 31 I’d be concerned. 😵‍💫🐂💩

[Ann Archy]

Is 30 gigs a lot?

[EQAndyBuzz]

“There are 30 gigabytes of data on the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol that has not been seen by the public, the Justice Department revealed in a court filing related to an upcoming Oath Keepers trial Thursday.”

Then they should present the 30 gb of data to the public. All the video footage, unedited.

[EQAndyBuzz]

All it takes is one video to put the Oathkeepers away for a long time. Just one. And without showing the evidence, they DOJ has nothing except some text messages without any context.

[Brilliant]

How much does it cost to generate 30 gigs of info?

[MtnClimber]

[Taxman]

Ping

[Delta 21]

Well, let’s see it!

All of it.

[Organic Panic]

30 gigs. BS. Factor that by 100 and that will be more accurate.