I appreciate your need to call me names and deflect the obvious weaknesses in your explanation, but how long do we have to wait before we can question the media’s claims?
This namecalling of science deniers is what got us in the mess we have in the first place. We are supposed to goose step with an explanation that is a million to one and dutifully bow to the propagandists like they are gods. No Thanks.
Again, doesn’t this event usually happen in projectile sports? Isn’t that the same tackle you see 100 times a game? How did his heart stop at the hospital without a blow? Why does his doctor say he doesn’t know what caused it?
Answer those questions and save your name calling.
I didn’t call you names. I didn’t deflect. YOU keep calling me names. YOU keep deflecting. Again WHO IS STOPPING YOU FROM ASKING QUESTIONS? Be specific.
Again DIDN’T call you names. But there you go calling me names. AGAIN.
When it comes to being hit by something there’s no magic in projectile vs not. Puck, ball, helmet, fist. It’s all round thing to the chest. We don’t know much about the off spot. We know sometimes somebody gets hit “there” (we’re not really sure where the spot is, other than “chest”) and their heart stops. What is it specifically about that hit vs other times that same person had that same area struck? We don’t know. As for why we see it more “often” (it’s a rare event, thankfully, so I’m not really comfortable calling it “often”) in hockey and baseball I’d say sample size. NHL season is 5 times as many games as NFL, and the MLB season is 10 times as many. Plus of course they both have a multiple minor leagues, even if we count the NCAA there’s still many many more times hockey and baseball games played than football.
Haven’t called you names. All the name calling is coming from YOU. You remain everything you accuse others of being.