Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Cold War With China Is Not The Answer: It risks turning into an existential hot war.
American Thinker ^ | 12/31/2022 | Matt Rowe

Posted on 12/31/2022 10:31:20 AM PST by SeekAndFind

It is folly to believe that the US should engage in a repeat of the Cold War with the rising world power that is China, reflecting the maxim that “Generals always fight the last war.” That implies that the current military strategy focuses too much on what happened before rather than what will happen next. Rather than repeating the Cold War, the US should rethink how it views its place in the world and work to partner with China on high-priority issues that affect both countries, like nuclear weapons, trade policies, natural resources, economics, etc. This necessarily requires that the US and China negotiate and live up to expected behaviors and policies as well as partnering in combating global threats that both countries face.

The US-Soviet Cold War involved two world powers of relatively equal military might who also had significant access to natural resources and technology, although the US enjoyed a significant lead on the technology side. The key to the US success in the Cold War was that the US economy was far stronger than the Soviet economy due to the Soviets’ fundamentally flawed central economic management. In the end, the US could outspend the USSR in everything from technology and military to supporting allies with various forms of foreign aid—including sending shiploads of wheat to the Soviets.

Most significantly, after WW2, US forces occupied key war-torn nations in Europe and Asia and were driven to adopt robust western forms of political and economic organization. Soviet dominance over Eastern European countries after WW2, all of which followed communist doctrines, did not result in similarly growing and powerful economies. Governments dominated by the Soviets were also far from desirable.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; coldwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 12/31/2022 10:31:20 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nothing like surrender to make things better.

Where do find these people?


2 posted on 12/31/2022 10:33:40 AM PST by Chainmail (Harrassment, to be effective, must be continuous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
BUNK!

Cowardice is no solution to aggression.

3 posted on 12/31/2022 10:36:43 AM PST by G Larry ( "woke" means 'stupid enough to fall for the promotion of every human weakness into a virtue')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Folly. Oh my.

This guy must have important opinions.


4 posted on 12/31/2022 10:37:59 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

any “partnership” with the communist chinese will be the old, “things will go along just greay, if we do things my way.”

no no no!


5 posted on 12/31/2022 10:37:59 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

They’ve apparently discovered American Thinker as a vehicle.


6 posted on 12/31/2022 10:42:22 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Nothing like surrender to make things better. Where do find these people?


Under the same rock that covers those who want to surrender Ukraine.


7 posted on 12/31/2022 10:49:58 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rather than repeating the Cold War, the US should rethink how it views its place in the world and work to partner with China on high-priority issues that affect both countries, like nuclear weapons, trade policies, natural resources, economics, etc.

************************************************************

Sure.....”partner” with the Chinese like we “partnered” with the South Vietnamese, the Afghans, Stalin and Pakistani’s to name just a few.

It is pure idiocy to believe you can “partner” with a communist dictator.


8 posted on 12/31/2022 10:52:20 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sure thing because China is so good at keeping their agreements


9 posted on 12/31/2022 10:59:08 AM PST by Nifster (OI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

He probably friends with Scott Ritter


10 posted on 12/31/2022 11:00:03 AM PST by Nifster (OI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The ONLY war we’ve won since WWII was the cold war.

I’m OK with a cold war with China.


11 posted on 12/31/2022 11:05:57 AM PST by null and void (It’s not far-right to prevent mass starvation. It’s far-left to cause mass starvation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Nothing like surrender to make things better.

Where do find these people?

/\

In the CCP payday line.

Full stop.


12 posted on 12/31/2022 11:27:21 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PIF

“Under the same rock that covers those who want to surrender Ukraine.”

This author is like you. Pro-Putin, pro-Chicom.


13 posted on 12/31/2022 11:48:36 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“partnering” with China is a really stupid idea. Then again, we are in no position to fight a cold war, much less a hot one.


14 posted on 12/31/2022 11:54:20 AM PST by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Surrendering to Stalin would have gone better for us than surrendering to the CCP.


15 posted on 12/31/2022 12:05:57 PM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R0CK3T

WE’RE GOING TO NEED TO START KILLING A LOT OF DEVIANTS


16 posted on 12/31/2022 12:06:22 PM PST by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

So be it.

Better them than our own being massacred by them.


17 posted on 12/31/2022 12:08:44 PM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

No offense, but South Vietnam was our ally. Maybe you meant North Vietnam.


18 posted on 12/31/2022 1:26:27 PM PST by Chainmail (Harrassment, to be effective, must be continuous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

People like to use the “existential” word.

If there were a war between China and the US, both would be in existence at the end. Therefore…it’s not existential.


19 posted on 12/31/2022 2:06:57 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

China must get control of the Worlds Reserve Currency and a hot war would guarantee it since the Dems have bankrupted America.


20 posted on 12/31/2022 2:53:45 PM PST by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson