Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amber Heard to Pay $1 Million to Johnny Depp in Settlement of Legal Battle
Variety ^ | K.J. Yossman, Gene Maddaus

Posted on 12/19/2022 3:38:43 PM PST by nickcarraway

Amber Heard will pay Johnny Depp $1 million to settle their long-running legal battle, in which each accused the other of domestic violence.

The sum is a significant reduction from the $8.35 million she was ordered to pay after a six-week trial in Virginia earlier this year. The payment is expected to come from her insurance carrier.

In a statement, Depp’s attorneys said that he would donate the money to charity. His attorneys have previously said that the case was “never about the money” for Depp. In her own statement, Heard said she had “lost faith in the American legal system.” She also said that the settlement spares her the ordeal of further litigation and allows her to finally “emancipate” herself from their marriage.

Depp originally filed a $50 million defamation claim against Heard in March 2019 after she published an op-ed in the Washington Post in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.”

At the trial in Fairfax, Va., each actor testified for several days, revealing lurid details of drug abuse and screaming matches. Their testimony was streamed live on YouTube and remixed endlessly on TikTok and Facebook. Heard alleged that Depp repeatedly assaulted her, choked her and once raped her with a liquor bottle. She often broke down in sobs during her testimony.

Depp, meanwhile, alleged that Heard was the aggressor in the relationship, and that he would try to retreat whenever she became violent. The couple had made audio recordings of their arguments during their marriage, and each side played clips they had selected to try to corroborate their accounts.

The seven-person jury ruled in Depp’s favor on three separate claims of defamation, awarding him $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. The latter sum was knocked down to $350,000 to comply with a statutory cap.

In a small consolation to Heard, the jury also found in her favor on one of her three counterclaims, finding Depp liable for a statement made by his attorney in which Heard was accused of perpetrating a “hoax.” Depp was ordered to pay Heard $2 million, leaving a net judgment of $8.35 million in Depp’s favor.

The following month, Heard filed a notice of appeal, with her attorney citing “errors” made by the court. However, the “Aquaman” actor has now agreed to withdraw her appeal.

In a statement posted on Instagram announcing the decision, Heard made clear that “There are no restrictions or gags with respect to my voice moving forward” and blasted the U.S. legal system for turning her testimony into “entertainment and social media fodder.”

She also compared her experience of the U.S. legal system to the U.K., where Depp sued British tabloid The Sun in 2020 for calling him a “wife beater” in an article. Heard was a chief witness for The Sun. In that case, the judge called the allegations “substantially true” and found in favor of The Sun.

In a statement, representatives for Depp said they were pleased with the outcome, and emphasized that the jury’s verdicts still stands.

“We are pleased to formally close the door on this painful chapter for Mr. Depp, who made clear throughout this process that his priority was about bringing the truth to light,” said Depp’s attorneys Benjamin Chew and Camille Vasquez. “The jury’s unanimous decision and the resulting judgement in Mr. Depp’s favor against Ms. Heard remain fully in place. The payment of $1 million – which Mr. Depp is pledging and will (actually) donate to charities – reinforces Ms. Heard’s acknowledgement of the conclusion of the legal system’s rigorous pursuit for justice.”

Heard first leveled her abuse allegations against Depp in 2016, in the course of her divorce from the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star. She later received $7 million in a settlement and the couple agreed not to speak of the matter again, signing non-disparagement and non-disclosure agreements.

Read Heard’s full statement below:

“After a great deal of deliberation I have made a very difficult decision to settle the defamation case brought against me by my ex-husband in Virginia.

It’s important for me to say that I never chose this. I defended my truth and in doing so my life as I knew it was destroyed. The vilification I have faced on social media is an amplified version of the ways in which women are re-victimized when they come forward. Now I finally have an opportunity to emancipate myself from something I attempted to leave over six years ago and on terms I can agree to. I have made no admission, this is not an act of concession. There are no restrictions or gags with respect to my voice moving forward.

I make this decision having lost faith in the American legal system, where my unprotected testimony served as entertainment and social media fodder.

When I took before a judge in the U.K., I was vindicated by a robust, impartial and fair system, where I was protected from having to give the worst moments of my testimony in front of the worlds media, and where the court found that I was subjected to domestic and sexual violence. In the U.S., however, I exhausted almost all my resources in advance of and during a trial in which I was subject to a courtroom in which abundant, direct evidence that corroborated my testimony was excluded and in which popularity and power mattered more than reason and due process. In the interim I was exposed to a type of humiliation that I simply cannot re-live. Even if my U.S. appeal is successful, the best outcome would be a re-trial where a new jury would have to consider the evidence age. I simply cannot go through that for a third time.

Time is precious, and I want to spend my time productively and purposefully. For too many years I have been caged in an arduous and expensive legal process, which has shown itself unable to protect me and my right to free speech. I cannot afford to risk an impossible bill – one that is not just financial but also psychological, physical and emotional. Women shouldn’t have to face abuse or bankruptcy for speaking her truth, but unfortunately it is not uncommon.

In settling this case I’m also choosing the freedom to dedicate my time to the work that helped me heal after my divorce; work that exists in realms in which I feel seen, heard and believed and in which I know I can effect change.

I will not be threatened, disheartened, or dissuaded by what happened from speaking the truth. No one can and no one will take that from me. My voice forever remains the most valuable asset I have.

I’d like to thank my outstanding appellate and original trial teams for their relentless hard work. I want to thank everyone who has supported me and I turn my attention to the growing support that I felt and seen publicly in the months since trial, and the efforts have been made to show solidarity with my story. Any survivor knows that the ability to tell their story often feels like the only relief. I cannot find enough words to tell you the hope your belief in me inspires. Not just for me, but for all of you.

Thank you. See you soon.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: good; mgtow; redpill; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 12/19/2022 3:38:43 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hahaha.


2 posted on 12/19/2022 3:41:05 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds like not a penny is coming out of the woman’s pockets (insurance company is paying).


3 posted on 12/19/2022 3:41:31 PM PST by SamAdams76 (4,733,703 | Truth Social | 87,874,312 | Twitter | Trump Followers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

They probably agreed to pay in return for the certainty of a lowered settlement.


4 posted on 12/19/2022 3:56:28 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Depp would be wise to just accept what his legal expenses were. It would make him a much more desirable actor for future roles.


5 posted on 12/19/2022 3:59:57 PM PST by cpdiii (CANE CUTTER-DECKHAND-ROUGHNECK-OILFIELD CONSULTANT-GEOLOGIST-PILOT-PHARMACIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

#BelieveAllFrontHolesWithBoderlinePersonalityDisorder


6 posted on 12/19/2022 4:06:49 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Correct. The proper headline would be, “Amber Heard’s Insurance Carrier to Pay $1 Million ...”


7 posted on 12/19/2022 4:14:54 PM PST by throwthebumsout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

IMO, Amber tried to write a check she could NOT cash.


8 posted on 12/19/2022 4:18:57 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

9 posted on 12/19/2022 4:26:21 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("There is no good government at all & none possible."--Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
She later received $7 million in a settlement and the couple agreed not to speak of the matter again, signing non-disparagement and non-disclosure agreements.

7 million dollars and she can't keep her big fat trap shut. In the end this will cost her all of that and more. At 36 her looks are fading and her reputation is known. She's a lying gold digger and now she has the rest of life to regret her choices and carefully laid plans. Some Saudi offered her something to come home with him.

10 posted on 12/19/2022 4:26:51 PM PST by BipolarBob (The party never stops until someone calls the cops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

😂


11 posted on 12/19/2022 4:28:50 PM PST by M_Continuum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

That’s a shit-pile of dough.


12 posted on 12/19/2022 4:30:05 PM PST by nesnah (Infringe - act so as to limit or undermine [something]; encroach on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I cant believe this. Because she has t*ts she only has to pay 1 million of the 8.35 million she owes him.

No woman would let a guy off the hook like this. Incredible. What a c u next tuesday.


13 posted on 12/19/2022 4:38:16 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Nice but not spectacular.


14 posted on 12/19/2022 4:49:29 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Bwaaa ha ha ha.... Sidney Watson: Amber Heard Sucks.
15 posted on 12/19/2022 5:09:29 PM PST by Stepan12 ("...To the American gulag with this guy.and with the beasts of the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man; Paladin2

She won a $1 million judgement against him, so subtract that.


16 posted on 12/19/2022 5:13:36 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Amber Heard is an bisexual female.
That’s more than a borderline disorder in my book. YMMV


17 posted on 12/19/2022 5:13:37 PM PST by oldvirginian (When I was a kid I wanted to be older…this is not what I expected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian

There’s a rumor about Amber, Cara Delevingne, and Elon...


18 posted on 12/19/2022 5:15:43 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Well, ain’t neither of the women hard on the eyes so I’d hit ‘em both. Both at the same time would be historically memorable.
Good on Elon if he did.


19 posted on 12/19/2022 6:31:49 PM PST by oldvirginian (When I was a kid I wanted to be older…this is not what I expected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I make this decision having lost faith in the American legal system, where my unprotected testimony served as entertainment and social media fodder.

The sh*t show was like the best entertainment we had this year.


20 posted on 12/19/2022 7:21:18 PM PST by Flick Lives (Cui bono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson