[BipolarBob]

As to President Biden’s remarks, he also said this: “Marriage — I mean this with all my heart — marriage is a simple proposition: Who do you love, and will you be loyal with that person you love? It’s not more complicated than that.”

And if one of those is underage, that will be quickly codified as legal, you bigoted person you. Biden says it's okay, the King has spoken.

[Tell It Right]

"And if one of those is underage, that will be quickly codified as legal, you bigoted person you. Biden says it's okay, the King has spoken."

If I understand it correctly, this bill does just that. In California I believe there's no age limit for "marriage" as long as the parent consents. Unfortunately our diversity-is-our-strength policy has led to an influx of many people in California for which underage marriage is the norm (as is underage sex, being as 12 is the legal limit in parts of Mexico and south of there, likewise with the the death-to-America! cult it's righteous to marry her as long as she's old enough to menstruate). What this bill does is say it's illegal for one state to not honor a "marriage" done legally in another state. So a pedo-man can now bring his child-bride to your state and if you try to protect her by alerting the child protective services in your state, this federal "law" says your state can't protect her.

[fwdude]

"Who do you love, and will you be loyal with that person you love?"

Sorry, Bidumb, but "loyalty" isn't any part of the definition of marriage any more than any other definitional requirements are any longer valid. In fact, faggots are in-our-face "proud" of their "open marriage" arrangements, at far higher rates than real marriages. Nothing "loyal" about that.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Also if one is not competent.

Get a three year old or a hundred and three year old to say "I do" and you have them.