Good for Sen Borelli!
Godspeed.
Probably a silly thought but the other day an idea came to me: what if U.S. Senator Sinema’s defection from the Democrat Party was the first rat jumping off a sinking ship. Could she have an idea that election fraud allegations/investigations/court rulings are going to turn decidedly against the Democrats and she’s trying to put distance between herself and the party?
A win here for the plaintiff will be a game changer.
Senator Sonny Borrelli..."disenfranchised by the malfeasance of Maricopa County election officials.""Malfeasance" is a good word:
2. Evil-doing; the doing of that which ought not to be done; wrongful conduct, especially official misconduct; violation of a public trust or obligation; specifically, the doing of an act which is positively unlawful or wrongful, in contradistinction to misfeasance, or the doing of a lawful act in a wrongful manner. The term is often inappropriately used instead of misfeasance.
3. The doing of an act which a person ought not to do; evil conduct; an illegal deed.
Just invalidate every Hobbs vote in Maricopa County and the certify the election.
I gather Fix News is not covering this, because Paul Ryan says all election results are to be accepted no matter what?
I don’t see any voter fraud, I haven’t investigated any voter fraud, because there is no voter fraud, which is why I don’t see any voter fraud, because I haven’t looked for any voter fraud because there is no voter fraud. . .
This is an important point. Even if Mohave County (and every other Arizona county) elections were squeaky clean and carried out competently, all of the other counties votes were nullified because of the obvious shenanigans in the (by far) most populous county in the state. It effectively skewered the overall result for the entire state.
Love to see it happen, but there’s next to no chance it will happen. Even if he got the case to court, it would likely take years before it settled, surely past the ‘26 election, making the suit moot by legal standards.
Didn’t it come out that the software program they were using had some serious issues with it, to the point that no one else was using it? The issues were know and they used them anyway?
Get back to us when something actually happens. Lots of allegations....show us the hard evidence. Everybody claims they have it but why isn’t it put out there for all to see it...??
ARIZONA revized statutes specifically prevent a person in authority from being able to run events thwt affect their position.
Therefore-—Katie Hobbs should have NEVER been in charge of an election in which she was a candidate.
COMPLETE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
ARIZONA revized statutes specifically prevent a person in authority from being able to run events that affect their position.
Therefore-—Katie Hobbs should have NEVER been in charge of an election in which she was a candidate.
COMPLETE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
These are civil suits. Although they might be nice, if a law is violated where in the hell are the criminal complaints!
Now to the merits of the case, and the political inclinations of the judge(s).