To: CFW
What you say about Dorsey makes sense. It’s likely that Musk needed to win Dorsey over in order to make the deal go through, so there may be a quid pro quo there.
16 posted on
12/13/2022 12:37:06 AM PST by
poconopundit
(Hard oak fist in an Irish velvet glove: Kayleigh the Shillelagh we salute your work!)
To: poconopundit
It’s likely that Musk needed to win Dorsey over in order to make the deal go through, so there may be a quid pro quo there.By the time Musk bought Twitter Dorsey was completely gone from management and owned less than 3% of the stock.
He really had nothing to say about the sale.
19 posted on
12/13/2022 5:04:35 AM PST by
semimojo
To: poconopundit; CFW
I am confused because I somehow thought that Dorsey was on board with Elon Musk in the takeover effort. That is, Dorsey was inside feeding Musk intelligence about the real situation within Twitter.
20 posted on
12/13/2022 5:10:03 AM PST by
bert
( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson