Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

76 members of Congress have violated a law designed to prevent insider trading and stop conflicts-of-interest
Business Insider ^ | 10 Dec 2022 | Dave Levinthal

Posted on 12/10/2022 11:39:29 PM PST by blueplum

Insider and several other news organizations have identified 76 members of Congress who've recently failed to properly report their financial trades as mandated by the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012, also known as the STOCK Act.

Congress passed the law a decade ago to combat insider trading and conflicts of interest among their own members and force lawmakers to be more transparent about their personal financial dealings....

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bastards; congress; crooks; demonicrats; hangem; house; incongruous; politicians; senate; stockact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
the Insider article lists all 76, both parties from just about every state. What should also be looked at is which committees these congresscritters sat on versus the investments/transactions made.
1 posted on 12/10/2022 11:39:29 PM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Corruption everywhere.


2 posted on 12/10/2022 11:47:14 PM PST by Mark17 (Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

BTTT


3 posted on 12/10/2022 11:59:51 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

That’s why they ran for office to begin with. The regular laws do not apply to them. It’s all about privilege and not about serving the people.


4 posted on 12/11/2022 1:27:24 AM PST by George J. Jetso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Wow.
Ugh. Ugh again. They probably didn’t report themselves because they didn’t even know …..and didn’t want to know what their spouses or dependent children were doing. Likely their financial consultants have carte blanche to make decisions about their portfolios in their best interests. I expected to see more names.
BTW. Their photos all look the same. D or R, Conservative tag or not, all the same.
“I take full responsibility for my lack of blah blah blah.” Sure.


5 posted on 12/11/2022 1:32:02 AM PST by FryingPan101 (God bless you, Jim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Laws only apply to us chumps. Not them.


6 posted on 12/11/2022 1:43:30 AM PST by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Waiting for anything to be done about the rampant, disgraceful, shameless corruption in our government.

still-waiting

7 posted on 12/11/2022 3:02:18 AM PST by Westbrook (The Democrats are wizards at two things: Finding votes and losing evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Criminals now have protection the weaponized agencies


8 posted on 12/11/2022 3:28:24 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

“While lawmakers who violate the STOCK Act face a fine, the penalty is usually small — $200 is the standard amount — or waived by House or Senate ethics officials. Ethics watchdogs and even some members of Congress have called for stricter penalties or even a ban on federal lawmakers from trading individual stocks.”

Good luck with that. So their spouses or children or siblings or in-laws or cousins or whatever will be the straw buyers. Some kinds of evil can’t be remedied. A better goal would be to go after big traders who deliberately make big buys or sell-offs in order to manipulate the market. That, at least, is doable. Insider trading, though? Like shoveling sh!t against the tide.


9 posted on 12/11/2022 3:33:36 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

By my count, it’s almost even (R 39 and D 37).

Bipartisanship in action. /spit


10 posted on 12/11/2022 3:47:48 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Fake news, fake pandemic, fake vaccine, fake election, fake president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

I’m surprised Nazi Pelousy isn’t on the list.


11 posted on 12/11/2022 3:56:33 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Fake news, fake pandemic, fake vaccine, fake election, fake president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Wikipedia - The STOCK Act required a one-year study of the growing political intelligence industry and requires every Member of Congress to publicly file and disclose any financial transaction of stocks, bond, commodities futures, and other securities within 45 days on their websites, rather than once a year as was required previously.

This should be centralized. 535 members of Congress. Who has time to monitor 535 websites?

It should be a centralized reporting database. Late reports should be flagged as such. And the member should be required to have a link to the database showing their trades on their individual websites.

Are all members even required to have web sites?

12 posted on 12/11/2022 3:58:55 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

The “within 45 days” is a joke. It should be “at least 45 days before transaction”. If they don’t like this law then they should liquidate everything and just get US Treasuries before they take the Oath of Office.


13 posted on 12/11/2022 4:15:25 AM PST by Degaston (no autocrats please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

More like 435 house and 50 Senate.


14 posted on 12/11/2022 4:19:53 AM PST by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

If they are Dem - doesn’t matter.

If they are Rep.- they’ll be prosecuted.


15 posted on 12/11/2022 5:29:46 AM PST by Baldwin77 (Super, Duper, Ultra Maga, subject of the Ultra Maga King Donald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

?


16 posted on 12/11/2022 5:30:34 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

A very bad look for Rand Paul, buying stock in the maker of Remdesivir, which is what has actually killed so many of those hospitalized for “Covid”.

It was universally given because the feds made massive hospital funding contingent on it and only it being given, and the Paul family bought the stock in March, 2020—and then reported it more than a year after it was required.


17 posted on 12/11/2022 5:35:08 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Prohibit active stock trading by members of Congress and their immediate families, put some real teeth into it, and you’d end up with a much less awful breed of congress critters.


18 posted on 12/11/2022 5:39:17 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

There should be no law prohibiting knowledge of a company that influences the stock price.

The concept of Trader Equality is foolsh


19 posted on 12/11/2022 5:47:13 AM PST by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

This, in part, help explain how a congress critter can do into the position with a net worth in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and come out with tens to hundreds of millions of dollars.

Perhaps their just lucky like Hillary Clinton with cattle futures.


20 posted on 12/11/2022 6:24:50 AM PST by No Party Affiliation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson