Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act - Passed today
Alberta Canada Province ^ | 12/8/22

Posted on 12/08/2022 2:57:10 PM PST by ifinnegan

The act allows Alberta to fight harmful federal laws and defend the constitutional federal-provincial division of powers.

Overview The Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act will defend Alberta’s interests by giving our province a legal framework to push back on federal laws or policies that negatively impact the province.

The act will be used to address federal legislation and policies that are unconstitutional, violate Albertans’ charter rights or that affect or interfere with our provincial constitutional rights.

The act gives Alberta a democratic legislative framework for defending the federal-provincial division of powers while respecting Canada's Constitution and the courts.

What the act does

The Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act will only be used when Alberta’s legislative assembly debates and passes a motion that identifies a specific federal program or piece of legislation as unconstitutional or causing harm to Albertans.

Government will ensure all constitutional and legal requirements are met before steps are taken to respond. Government will respect court decisions if a response is challenged successfully in court.

What the act doesn't do

The Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act:

will not allow Alberta to defy Canada’s Constitution

will not allow Alberta to separate from Canada

will not allow cabinet to issue unconstitutional orders-in-council, including giving instructions that are outside of provincial jurisdiction to provincial entities

will not allow cabinet to give instructions to private individuals or corporations that aren’t provincial entities, to violate federal law


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alberta; secession; sovereigntyact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Fighting back and an example for us.
1 posted on 12/08/2022 2:57:10 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

A weakened bill, but one that can be built upon.

Hopefully.


2 posted on 12/08/2022 2:57:58 PM PST by Jonty30 (You can't spell liberal without the a-hole. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Bfl


3 posted on 12/08/2022 3:02:41 PM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

This is an inevitable step towards secession. I say that because the federal government in Ottawa will never obey this.

And when the two governments are at odds over something and the federal government pushes then the provincial government will have no choice but to secede.


4 posted on 12/08/2022 3:05:14 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

it’s kind of a parallel to the “State’s Rights” argument in the US

FedGov controls some areas, Provincial Govts control others

Alberta is just asserting its Constitutional rights


5 posted on 12/08/2022 3:19:29 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I’d rather have Alberta as the 51st state than either DC or PR.


6 posted on 12/08/2022 3:22:17 PM PST by Michael.SF. ( The problem today: people are more concerned about feelings than responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

They’ve gotta do something; their central govt is vicious.


7 posted on 12/08/2022 3:42:32 PM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Or new country with Montana, Idaho, Wyoming etc…


8 posted on 12/08/2022 3:50:40 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

“The ...Act will only be used when Alberta’s legislative assembly debates AND passes a motion that identifies a specific federal program or piece of legislation as unconstitutional or causing harm to Albertans.”

Soooo, until the legislature debates AND passes a motion the federal order is in effect? This is a rubber stamp for edicts from their federal government. Empty words.


9 posted on 12/08/2022 3:52:31 PM PST by Duke of Milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Duke of Milan

I don’t think your comment makes sense.


10 posted on 12/08/2022 3:53:39 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Didn’t Trudeau tell Alberta to stop using fertilizer ?


11 posted on 12/08/2022 4:00:41 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Canada’s Deep State is laughing its butt off.

Canada’s freedom-loving citizenry needs to do the same thing we do: secure free and fair elections for its citizenry.


12 posted on 12/08/2022 4:04:28 PM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Duke of Milan

I believe that Alberta lacks a province-wide police force. The RCMP, under the control of their federal government, handles policing matters, although cities like Calgary have their own police forces. There are no elected sheriffs in Canada. Income taxes are handled by the Federal government, with the provinces receiving a share of the revenues. Provincial authorities do not have an equivalent to the American National Guard, as all military matters are under Federal control. In summary, provincial premiers and parliaments in Canada have far less power than do American state governments and legislatures.


13 posted on 12/08/2022 4:06:25 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
Free Alberta
14 posted on 12/08/2022 4:18:19 PM PST by PerConPat (A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground. - Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“The act will be used to address federal legislation...”

I would have thought they used the term “parliamentary” legislation not “federal.”

I had no idea.


15 posted on 12/08/2022 4:42:13 PM PST by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

“...provincial premiers and parliaments in Canada have far less power than do American state governments and legislatures.”

That’s the difference between a province and a State.


16 posted on 12/08/2022 4:56:05 PM PST by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Canada does not have a 2nd Amendment.

Not sure it has the comparable to the 1st Amendment.

The inhabitants are subjects, not citizens.

Canada if polite. Their politicians are as bad as ours in DC.

Kings and Queens are a suck idea.


17 posted on 12/08/2022 5:14:33 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Canada doesn’t have a Constitution with its Bill of Rights such as we do in the US.

Within the boundaries of their national charter, I suspect Alberta is pushing back against their federal as best they can.

18 posted on 12/08/2022 6:17:13 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Maybe someday they can be a territory do the republic of Texas


19 posted on 12/08/2022 6:50:47 PM PST by Manuel OKelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew
The background of the Canadian Confederation was that of then recently concluded American War Between the States. Canada and the British Crown opted for a stronger Federal government than the United States had. The Southern states had their own militias and, with the exception of Texas, had no need for the Federal military to fight Indians or protect an international border. They had their own tax sources, and the Federal government was mainly reliant on tariffs. The Southern secession was partially caused by a tariff dispute.

Recognizing the recent troubles to the south, the Fathers of Confederation decided to keep military, taxation, and other matters centralized.

20 posted on 12/08/2022 7:37:49 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson