The Constitution created the Supreme Court to rule on the the laws of the land and to interpret those laws as well.
They have interpreted that in contract law, fraud invalidates a contract making it unenforceable.
The Constitution is a contract between the citizens & the government defining the limits of their power.
It does not provide remedies, for the remedies are left up to the Supreme Court to decide.
The Supreme Court refused to do what they were created to do, namely hear disputes and then make a ruling in the disputes.
Furthermore, elections are also contracts between the citizens and the government. That contract is to ensure a fair & honest election so that no citizen is disenfranchised by an election due to fraudulent activities.
The Constitution clearly gives state legislatures the power to govern the elections within their states. That power within the states was usurped from state legislatures by governors and state supreme courts, in direct violation of the Constitution. When these usurpation cases were tried in state courts they ruled against the legislatures.
The U.S. Supreme Court refused to take the cases, which mean they then violated their oaths to protect the Constitution from both domestic & foreign enemies by not intervening where they most certainly had the authority to do so.
There was a complete breakdown of Constitutional measures that are in the Constitution that were totally ignored.
You & others are telling me that there is no way of combating fraud. Well, I fervidly disagree with all of the naysayers on their misguided contentions that their are no remedies after an election has already taken certain steps, especially when other steps were ignored & bypassed. That is just people who have been brainwashed to believe that falsehood.
Again, you are trying to apply contract law where it is not applicable. If you won’t believe those of us here on FR who have tried to explain that to you, again, please consult a Constitutional lawyer, or even one specializing in contract law. Or any lawyer. Surely you must know a lawyer, or there is one who attends your church.
The Constitution is not a contract. It simply is not. I suppose one might think of it as a sort of covenant, but that’s a real stretch. Why do you suppose Constitutional law and contract law are two separate branches? Hmm?
The Constitution gives state legislatures the power to appoint Electors. Nothing more, nothing less. Please read it. No power was usurped from the state legislatures, either.
Of course there are ways of fighting fraud through the courts, as I and others have told you. The window for doing that has closed. The state legislators duly appointed their Electors, those Electors duly cast their votes and they were duly counted. There was no fraud whatsoever in that process. Even Trump has not claimed there was. It’s done and cannot Constitutionally be undone, no matter what you wish or think or say.