[DoughtyOne]

Yes

Does any of us think Twitter owners and managers had a right
to remove information on orders of VP Biden?

That right there is a violation of the first amendment.

Those owners and managers should have their stake in the
game cashed out right there, eliminating their ability
to impact the voices heard on the forum.

That is the right Trump was calling to be removed. And I
think quite appropriately.

Why can’t folks think?

[IrishBrigade]

‘That is the right Trump was calling to be removed.’

well, for such an explicit suggestion is there any reason he couldn’t articulate it himself...?

[newzjunkey]

Biden was NOT VP. He was out of power. How a PRIVATE company reacts to requests by a political campaign (BOTH campaigns, in fact) has nothing to do with the first amendment prohibiting the government from abridging free political speech.

Is it immoral? Absolutely. Unethical? Yes. Deceitful? You bet! They held themselves out as the 21st century public square and arbiter of “facts” when they were truthfully partisans manipulating an election. They were the bots.

[Kathy in OC]

Was Biden VP at that time? I think he was a private citizen, which makes the first amendment a non-issue.