To: E. Pluribus Unum
Technically it’s a political campaign asking, not the government. It’s definitely chilling speech though. It’s hard to say whether this is a loophole the Dems legally exploited.
7 posted on
12/03/2022 9:17:06 AM PST by
newzjunkey
(Vote for Hershel Walker by Dec 6th to stop Warnock (D) in Georgia)
To: newzjunkey
It amounts to undeclared campaigning by an entity not listed as a PAC.
9 posted on
12/03/2022 9:19:24 AM PST by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: newzjunkey
Technically it’s a political campaign asking, not the government. So it stopped when Brandon usurped the Presidency?
11 posted on
12/03/2022 9:19:53 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████.)
To: newzjunkey
It’s an in-kind political donation and violates federal campaign finance laws.
13 posted on
12/03/2022 9:20:54 AM PST by
Az Joe
(The Lake Effect! Lake has the right stuff!)
To: newzjunkey
think they stopped once in office?
24 posted on
12/03/2022 9:37:17 AM PST by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: newzjunkey
File under “dirty tricks”
26 posted on
12/03/2022 9:47:48 AM PST by
databoss
To: newzjunkey
Dorsey's Twitter engaged in 'in-kind campaign contribution' to the Bai Din campaign as well as obstruction of justice and violation of various news outlets First Amendment rights and on and on..
Electioneering by Twitter at the behest of the RATS. So what else is new?
I am MORE interested in Twitter's BANNING FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP from the platform. To me, this is MORE egregious and inexplicable..
Declare Twitter a COMMON CARRIER ALREADY, DAMNIT! It has risen to that level as a means of real-time mass communication!
34 posted on
12/03/2022 10:12:46 AM PST by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: newzjunkey
The FBI reaching out to Facebook wasn't a political campaign doing it.
We can assume that if the FBI reached out to Facebook like Zuckerberg said, they also reached out to Twitter.
-PJ
42 posted on
12/03/2022 10:29:28 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: newzjunkey
Technically it’s a political campaign asking, not the government. It’s definitely chilling speech though. It’s hard to say whether this is a loophole the Dems legally exploited. True, but it clearly was the DNC at the center of a large spider web. It was obviously a conspiracy to commit crimes. So the question arises - at what point can a case be brought against the Democratic Party under the RICO statute?
I think it's clear we've passed that point long ago.
Not that the DOJ would ever bring RICO charges, but that just goes to prove the larger point.
To: newzjunkey
The FBI is involved but Apples threat to deplatform Twitter to keep the feds out of it.
92 posted on
12/03/2022 2:49:56 PM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson