[newzjunkey]

Technically it’s a political campaign asking, not the government. It’s definitely chilling speech though. It’s hard to say whether this is a loophole the Dems legally exploited.

[Rurudyne]

It amounts to undeclared campaigning by an entity not listed as a PAC.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Technically it’s a political campaign asking, not the government.

So it stopped when Brandon usurped the Presidency?

[Az Joe]

It’s an in-kind political donation and violates federal campaign finance laws.

[joshua c]

think they stopped once in office?

[databoss]

File under “dirty tricks”

[CivilWarBrewing]

Dorsey's Twitter engaged in 'in-kind campaign contribution' to the Bai Din campaign as well as obstruction of justice and violation of various news outlets First Amendment rights and on and on..

Electioneering by Twitter at the behest of the RATS. So what else is new?

I am MORE interested in Twitter's BANNING FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP from the platform. To me, this is MORE egregious and inexplicable..

Declare Twitter a COMMON CARRIER ALREADY, DAMNIT! It has risen to that level as a means of real-time mass communication!

[Political Junkie Too]

The FBI reaching out to Facebook wasn't a political campaign doing it.

We can assume that if the FBI reached out to Facebook like Zuckerberg said, they also reached out to Twitter.

-PJ

[Thilly Thailor]

Technically it’s a political campaign asking, not the government. It’s definitely chilling speech though. It’s hard to say whether this is a loophole the Dems legally exploited.

True, but it clearly was the DNC at the center of a large spider web. It was obviously a conspiracy to commit crimes. So the question arises - at what point can a case be brought against the Democratic Party under the RICO statute?

I think it's clear we've passed that point long ago.

Not that the DOJ would ever bring RICO charges, but that just goes to prove the larger point.

[central_va]

The FBI is involved but Apples threat to deplatform Twitter to keep the feds out of it.