Portman is involved? Then you know its stupid.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27
He's been going scorched earth on his way out, hasn't he?
Be interesting to check his money flows, I think.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Proof that money trees do exists despite a nation on the verge of economic meltdown from an unsustainable national debt?
3 posted on
11/29/2022 1:37:11 PM PST by
cranked
To: ChicagoConservative27
We have lots of money available for this?
To: ChicagoConservative27
Portman is on his way out! He should just fade away.
5 posted on
11/29/2022 1:38:09 PM PST by
griswold3
(Truth, Beauty and Goodness )
To: ChicagoConservative27
I’d prefer affordable school choice and voucher legislation.
6 posted on
11/29/2022 1:39:01 PM PST by
1Old Pro
To: ChicagoConservative27
Affordable Housing Legislation that would actually work:
Cut Federal Spending.
7 posted on
11/29/2022 1:40:57 PM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(The only way to secure your own future is to create it yourself.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Making it more affordable for some means making it less affordable for others.
8 posted on
11/29/2022 1:41:23 PM PST by
I want the USA back
(Our news media isn't worth camel spit. Neither is the democrat party. )
To: ChicagoConservative27
The bad news is you have to move to Detroit.
9 posted on
11/29/2022 1:41:24 PM PST by
monkeyshine
(live and let live is dead)
To: ChicagoConservative27
10 posted on
11/29/2022 1:41:56 PM PST by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: ChicagoConservative27
if starter homes were profitable for builders and lenders, they would be building them. as it is, a single wide is a good starter home.. see if buyers can take care of that.
If you can't take care of a little, why would someone put you in charge of alot?
13 posted on
11/29/2022 1:45:28 PM PST by
Ikeon
(Stupid Should Hurt.. "he didn't deserve that" is a misnomer)
To: ChicagoConservative27
And where in the Constitution is this authorized? If this needs to be done, let the states do it.
To: ChicagoConservative27
This kind of crap is why we really don’t have a truly capitalist system.
how about just take less from people in the first place and give everyone universal incentives
versus taking confiscated monies from certain people/groups and redistributing them to certain peoples/groups.
How about less govt instead of confiscating/referee govt?
How about capitalism vs fascism/cronyism/socialism?
15 posted on
11/29/2022 1:50:39 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: ChicagoConservative27; All
Is this the bill that demolishes the suburbs?
Where lots of multi-unit housing goes in and the towns get kickbacks?
To: ChicagoConservative27
Fed.gov housing
it will be a hell
17 posted on
11/29/2022 1:52:01 PM PST by
PGR88
To: ChicagoConservative27
I sure hope ghetto retards can move to my neighborhood.
Diversity is our strength…
18 posted on
11/29/2022 1:53:23 PM PST by
EEGator
To: ChicagoConservative27
Either build more projects, or see more urban folks moving into the suburbs.
19 posted on
11/29/2022 1:53:54 PM PST by
familyop
("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
To: ChicagoConservative27
How to get affordable housing:
WORK
20 posted on
11/29/2022 1:54:15 PM PST by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
To: ChicagoConservative27
"...in struggling communities..."
See?
21 posted on
11/29/2022 1:54:47 PM PST by
familyop
("For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas" (John Webster, "The White Devil" 1612).)
To: ChicagoConservative27
These will be little semi-Section 8 shit-boxes that the rest of us will pay for, and look like unkempt crap in 10 years.
The “People who annoy you” will move into the suburbs in droves to these ‘hoods’ and destroy them just like they’ve done to the cities.
22 posted on
11/29/2022 1:56:01 PM PST by
nesnah
(Infringe - act so as to limit or undermine [something]; encroach on)
To: ChicagoConservative27
“Affordable Housing” means spending $500,000 to build a one unit in a duplex or townhouse, and then providing $1,000 a month in rent support.
Not particularly affordable to the taxpayer.
23 posted on
11/29/2022 1:59:32 PM PST by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson