Skip to comments.LISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court hears arguments over Biden enforcement of Trump-era border policy
Posted on 11/29/2022 8:41:57 AM PST by bitt
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday over a blocked Biden administration policy that would prioritize deportation of people in the country illegally who pose the greatest public safety risk.
The arguments are scheduled to start at 10 a.m. ET. Listen in the player above.
Republican-led states sued and won a nationwide court order that is meant to limit immigration officers’ discretion in deciding whom to deport. The justices are hearing arguments in the case Tuesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at pbs.org ...
When does the SCOTUS declare the border illegitimate and Invasion as a civil right?
It would make sense that the nation ends with the absurd institutions it erected simply abolishing it by diktat.
You would think that the words “defend and protect” would be all that would need to be said.
If the Supreme Court was of any use they would rule that the government is breaking the constitution by allowing an invasion of the united states.
Failure to enforce existing immigration laws is a violation of their oath of office.
It is not the executive branches job to decide what is legal or not, it is simply to ENFORCE the laws.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 8:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
In my adult life, I can name TWO that actually took this to heart and did it. President Reagan and President Trump.
FReepers that are older than me can add to this august body of Presidents as they see fit, of course. ;)
And the Dems (plus stealth Dems) swindled Reagan by failing to perform what they promised to do in exchange for amnesty.
Dems and RINOs passed some "asylum language" which enables them to submit more applications than the system can process. I think that this process violates the Constitution but let's see what SCOTUS says.
(a)?Authority to apply for asylum
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien's status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.
They sure did! Grrrrr!
Vehemently and rudely.
How do you make the audio work?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.