Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The US Supreme Court Case that Could Change Everything
Golden Age of Gaia ^ | 11/26/2022 | Suzanne Maresca

Posted on 11/28/2022 12:34:49 PM PST by nikos1121

From the website ralandbrunson.com, updated as of November 23, 2022

Background ~

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote.

What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a “Complaint” and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants.

Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy’s lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland’s lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS.

The events of both lawsuits [from March 23, 2021 to November 23, 2022] can be seen at https://ralandbrunson.com/


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: election; hh2; lawsuit; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: nikos1121

Thanks. Fingers crossed.


21 posted on 11/28/2022 12:51:37 PM PST by MarMema (No bugs for consumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Not true. They’ve lost in the lower courts, allowing them to pursue it in The SCOTUS.

If it’s so frivolous, then why is it even on the docket to be discussed.

Only 4 judges are needed to move it forward.


22 posted on 11/28/2022 12:51:54 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

SCOTUS has not agreed to hear the case. The linked file is just an application for a grant of certiori, which the court will not grant.

No comment on the merits, just observing the facts on the ground.


23 posted on 11/28/2022 12:52:40 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Also, it’s docketed as an “emergency” hearing.

Even if they lose in the end, if it moves forward for discussion it could change everything.


24 posted on 11/28/2022 12:53:07 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“… hey discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted…”

So, the Senate vote was tied?


25 posted on 11/28/2022 12:53:28 PM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

If DJT ever again resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave it will be no earlier than 1/20/2025...reagrdless of what happens in with case.


26 posted on 11/28/2022 12:54:46 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (I Miss Jimmy Carter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I said the same thing, but when you listen to the video and the update, it strikes me as very funny that it’s even on the docket.

The SCOTUS only reviews a few cases per year, yet they’re reviewing this one.

I keep saying this, but only 4 judges are needed to move forward where it will be discussed and in the media.

Let’s pray that they people do what is right.


27 posted on 11/28/2022 12:55:07 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: algore
I'm not sure that even if they win their case, that the requested relief is constitutional.

I don't think a Supreme Court (or any other court) has the constitutional authority to remove an elected member from office. Article 1 Section 5 of the Constitution says that it is up to each house to expel a member, and only after a two-thirds majority vote to do so.

28 posted on 11/28/2022 12:55:34 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
None of these guys are lawyers, and they have lost every flakey case they’ve filed. Their “case” is “docketed” which only means it was received and logged in. It is not a determination by the court to hear it. This is flakey Don Quixote stuff.

Federal judges have contempt for upholding the idea of individuals having fundamental rights that are "inalienable". They typically dismiss such claims with little to no comment. If they must write an opinion, they misstate either the evidence or the argument. This case is not likely to be heard at SCOTUS. If Texas couldn't sue Pennsylvania at SCOTUS, its doubtful Joe Shmoe can.
29 posted on 11/28/2022 12:56:35 PM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I know, it’s crazy, but the SCOTUS is reviewing it, just the same.

Hey, at this point, all of us here have zilch faith in the system anymore. Free and fair elections in the USA? WHAT A FRIGGIN JOKE!!!!

I take my hats off to these guys.


30 posted on 11/28/2022 12:56:43 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Doesn’t fraud vitiate everything?


31 posted on 11/28/2022 12:58:26 PM PST by A Voice (As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the end times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

That is correct. 4 judges can move it forward.

In essence, it’s a group of private citizens petitioning the court to review what we all know is true, i.e. that foreign entities influenced our elections. They attacked us.


32 posted on 11/28/2022 12:58:38 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121; Fido969

The Supreme Court receives about 10,000 petitions for certiorari, but only hears about 80 of them. So the odds of this being heard, apart from any merits of the case, are about 1%.

I suspect THIS case has much poorer odds than that.


33 posted on 11/28/2022 12:59:42 PM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Congress had a sworn duty to review the complaints that were brought before them. They didn’t. This is the lawsuit.

Also, there’s been no objection to it. So, it’s before the SCOTUS.


34 posted on 11/28/2022 12:59:59 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
*Oath of Office

Possibly related, the SCOTUS has ruled several times since the early 1800’s that oath to obtain US citizenship is ceremonial only and is not binding in that one can have dual citizenship and allegiance to a foreign power.

SCOTUS also ruled that the oath for citizenship would not be binding unless Congress established law to make it so.

Would these rulings apply to oath of office?

That the oath is ceremonial only?

35 posted on 11/28/2022 1:00:35 PM PST by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

They never investigated the complaints before them.


36 posted on 11/28/2022 1:00:47 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: algore

Only four needed? Well, everyone has a fantasy.
It would be fun if SCOTUS takes the cases.


37 posted on 11/28/2022 1:01:41 PM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

That this story has traction tells me a lot about the psyche of the American people. We are so desperate for a shred of integrity to right the election fraud rampant in this country. We hold on to threads of hope this nation can be turned around. It’s too late. A fraud sits in the Presidential office. The Republic is over. I don’t know where we go from here, but acknowledging the reality of where we are is a start.


38 posted on 11/28/2022 1:01:52 PM PST by One4Life (It's all about control )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

The question is: Did Congress follow 3 U.S.C. 15 which set the method for objections by Members of Congress to electoral votes.

Since they did, there is no court case.


39 posted on 11/28/2022 1:02:19 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

That’s the point, very few cases make it this far. It’s being heard.


40 posted on 11/28/2022 1:03:42 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson