Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is gay marriage really the hill the GOP wants to die on in 2023?
Hotair ^ | 11/22/2022 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 11/22/2022 9:04:28 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Theoria

I agree, but I would argue that it is usually the states who enforce contract law - not the feds.


41 posted on 11/22/2022 11:28:46 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction (Vim vi repellere licet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A strike

I am not sure I agree.

Many more people had dogs in the fight concerning abortion, men and women. Not many straight people, especially men, believe gay marriage is good, much less fight for it. Especially since it was also a states rights issue before SCROTUS forced it on eveyone. Its clear most states didn’t want it than wanted it. So I think it may not take as long.


42 posted on 11/22/2022 11:38:02 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
there is no provision in the bill to prohibit the government from removing tax-exempt status of institutions based on religious beliefs about same-sex marriage (either for or against) and the bill’s Democratic sponsors have refused to consider such an amendment.

Good point. They are going after religion wholesale, not just the retail matter of what's called "marriage."

43 posted on 11/23/2022 1:21:10 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
there is no provision in the bill to prohibit the government from removing tax-exempt status of institutions based on religious beliefs about same-sex marriage (either for or against) and the bill’s Democratic sponsors have refused to consider such an amendment.

Good point. They are going after religion wholesale, not just the retail matter of what's called "marriage."

44 posted on 11/23/2022 1:22:44 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Maybe. but homosexuals and their lobby are fierce,read vicious.
And they now OWN the culture, corporate and esp edu K-12-all academe, even most churches.


45 posted on 11/23/2022 1:57:59 AM PST by A strike ("The worse, the better." - V.I.Lenin, (and Klaus Schwab and Soros))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s a lot of hills.
Could it be the case that America is a land full of hills, and there’s none that are worth dying on.


46 posted on 11/23/2022 3:12:43 AM PST by Samurai_Jack (This is not about hypocrisy, this is about hierarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well what hill are you willing to defend, Jazz?

You think gov. has no business in the business of marriage? Well they damn sure do, whether it matters to you or not.

You can see the results of the disaster Oberkfell was in every tranny/homo. push in YOUR public schools. “Because its legal now...”

STFU.


47 posted on 11/23/2022 3:14:18 AM PST by Adder (ALL Democrats are the enemy. NO QUARTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sodomy is one of the four sins that cries to Heaven for vengeance. We have to be opposed to it being normalised and applauded.


48 posted on 11/23/2022 3:17:58 AM PST by Trump_Triumphant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
I agree with the author that the government — especially the Federal government — should be out of the marriage business entirely.

Ironically, the Supreme Court got it RIGHT in the Obergefell decision from one critical standpoint that was the underlying basis of the case: the provisions of the U.S. tax code related to married couples are unconstitutional. It is ludicrous for the Federal tax code to recognize marriage when marriage law is administered at the state level.

49 posted on 11/23/2022 3:31:31 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So many hills to die on.


50 posted on 11/23/2022 4:23:03 AM PST by Baldwin77 (Super, Duper, Ultra Maga, subject of the Ultra Maga King Donald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The pig GOPe senator from Indiana, Todd Young, voted for this. A special place in hell awaits this neocon Bit_h.


51 posted on 11/23/2022 4:27:41 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

You are kidding, right?


52 posted on 11/23/2022 4:29:16 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Trying to repeal gay marriage will energize the Dem base like abortion did, while not getting the Republican base worked up. Bad political move.


53 posted on 11/23/2022 4:32:48 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (The rot of all principle begins with a single compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If upending the foundations of civilization isn’t the hill to die on, then nothing is.


54 posted on 11/23/2022 4:51:05 AM PST by fwdude (Society has been fully polarized now, and you have to decide on which pole you want to be found.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Go along to get along.” Any idiot can do that.


55 posted on 11/23/2022 4:55:43 AM PST by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“I don’t care who gets married because their actions don’t cause harm to my family or anyone else if both participants are consenting. I have gay friends who are married and their unions haven’t managed to destroy my own marriage which has been skipping along for going on thirty years now.”

The idiot author fails to realize that the same thing can be said if plural marriage were condoned and legalized. Or incestuous marriage. Or MAP (minor attracted person) marriage. Or marriage to animals. None of these would technically “harm” his/her/its marriage.


56 posted on 11/23/2022 4:57:29 AM PST by fwdude (Society has been fully polarized now, and you have to decide on which pole you want to be found.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

They will lose a good portion of the religious rights vote. The GOP offers no reason to vote for them except we’re not Democrats, but in reality they’re exactly that.

I think it’s time for the GOP to die. Trump needs to burn it down and salt the earth beneath it. This party offers nothing to conservatives.


57 posted on 11/23/2022 5:10:58 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just like the Tories in the UK: “Gay is good but trans is icky.”


58 posted on 11/23/2022 5:12:32 AM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

The GOP congress are cowards politically and physically.


59 posted on 11/23/2022 5:13:38 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Hill to die on”? How many such “hills” has there been for both parties for how many decades? Did either party die? The two party system always shambles forward through it all. Let’s try to make at least one party be worth voting for.


60 posted on 11/23/2022 5:15:35 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson