Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Turns Its Fighters Into UAVs; Could Swarm Taiwan From Five ‘Hardened’ Forward Airfields – Reports
The EurAsian Times ^ | November 22, 2022 | Parth Satam

Posted on 11/22/2022 4:43:28 PM PST by TigerLikesRoosterNew

China Turns Its Fighters Into UAVs; Could Swarm Taiwan From Five ‘Hardened’ Forward Airfields – Reports

EXPERT REVIEWS

By Parth Satam

November 22, 2022

A report by the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies (MIAS) identifies five forward airfields China could use to launch Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle (UCAV) swarms against Taiwan.

Legacy aircraft converted into drones (J-6, J-7, J-8) have been concluded to be pressed in as a part of the initial wave of attacks to soften Taiwanese air defenses.



These highly developed and defended airfields with hardened airfields can then be taken over by People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) Su-30MKK, J-16, or J-10 fighters for sustained operations against Taiwan.


The distinction of this airfield is the total of 126 concealed, buried, camouflaged, and hardened shelters to station both UAVs and regular combat aircraft.


While the report calls for suppressing these airfields early in a Chinese military intervention in Taiwan, it notes that the United States Air Force (USAF) lacks the range, technological and logistical capability to do so.


The study by Daniel Rice, a non-resident fellow at MIAS, goes on to study each airfield’s satellite photo by zooming in on structures and facilities like surface-to-air (SAM) defenses existing and under-construction shelters, hangars, ammunition storages, and types of aircraft parked to draw its inferences.

(Excerpt) Read more at eurasiantimes.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: australia; ccp; china; drone; solomonislands; taiwan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2022 4:43:28 PM PST by TigerLikesRoosterNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

The US isn’t going to defend Taiwan.

The US will happily sell non-nuclear weapons to Taiwan for its defense.

Taiwan needs to develop nuclear weapons to hold the Red Tiger at bay.


2 posted on 11/22/2022 4:47:25 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

It will be a modern day Battle of Britain type scenario.


3 posted on 11/22/2022 4:49:06 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

UAVs must be quipped with software to direct the aircraft to target. Suspect that there are nerds on Taiwan who just might know how to hack those guidance systems and redirect the aircraft.


4 posted on 11/22/2022 4:49:15 PM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

The PLA will be outing north from Harbin long before it tries for Taiwan.

Look!!! A squirrel!!!


5 posted on 11/22/2022 4:50:47 PM PST by datura (Eventually, the Lord and the Truth will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

UAVs that are intended to be used as single use expendable decoys don’t have to have any external command comm links. Basically a big fire and forget missile. No comm link, nothing to hack.


6 posted on 11/22/2022 4:57:50 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: allendale

I don’t think China would care about accuracy too much.
Only a few would need to be accurate to metres. Being flying bombs otherwise.


7 posted on 11/22/2022 5:01:10 PM PST by Jonty30 (You can't spell liberal without the a-hole. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

That’s what I’m thinking. Give it a GPS location and let it crash. 5000 UAV’s built like that would do a lot of damage.


8 posted on 11/22/2022 5:01:51 PM PST by Jonty30 (You can't spell liberal without the a-hole. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

Rotsa ruck


9 posted on 11/22/2022 5:04:32 PM PST by RKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

A fighter pilot’s dream. Lots of easy kills. Drop back and let the SAMs take the next wave and swoop in on the stragglers.


10 posted on 11/22/2022 5:13:22 PM PST by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Basically a big fire and forget missile. No comm link, nothing to hack.

How does it get to the target?

11 posted on 11/22/2022 5:16:50 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: allendale

That’s my first thought too, Alan-a-Dale.


12 posted on 11/22/2022 5:18:35 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Give it a GPS location and let it crash. 5000 UAV’s built like that would do a lot of damage.

GPS (or Cnicomm equivalent) will work during the battle for Taiwan?

13 posted on 11/22/2022 5:18:38 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew
Blowing up china's infrastructure and communications, stone age beijing
into piles of smoking radioactive rubble, would sanitize the issue.
14 posted on 11/22/2022 5:28:59 PM PST by chief lee runamok (Anti Socialist Derelict At Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

easy to shoot down as they will not evade.


15 posted on 11/22/2022 5:46:36 PM PST by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

I’m not sure these will have any remote control capability. While the author fantasizes about them being equipped for air to air and SEAD missions, I suspect they will be little more than decoys or missiles. The “Eurasian Times” is very low quality source.

The USAF has converted about 200 F-16s to QF-16 Drones. Before the F-16, they had F-4 drones, and before that F-100, F-102 and F-106 were modified as target drones. The QF-16 is as maneuverable as the F-16 and is flown by a pilot on the ground, up to four drones by a single pilot. It already carries chaff, flares and ECM/EA pods, and it wouldn’t surprise me if the USAF had already incorporated weapons. With the F-16 being “fly by wire”, it is much better suited as a drone than the J-6/7/8. Of course AI will be the real game changer in drone capability.


16 posted on 11/22/2022 6:06:59 PM PST by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Revolutionary

And that is exactly what the drones are intended to be. A fighter pilot’s dream and an easy target for SAMs. So that they can soak Taiwan’s AAMs and SAMs and make it easier for the more modern fighters to survive.


17 posted on 11/22/2022 6:16:54 PM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

The “Red Tiger”?

Spare us.


18 posted on 11/22/2022 6:18:03 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

The US defending Taiwan would be a losing proposition.


19 posted on 11/22/2022 6:20:45 PM PST by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRoosterNew

Leftist sure can’t stand people doing their own thing, going their own way.

Any sane group would let Taiwan go. It’s not bothering anybody.

But no, leftist have to control.

It’s their nature. They know better than you how you should run your life.


20 posted on 11/22/2022 6:41:08 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson