Posted on 11/20/2022 8:20:14 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Is this the same investigation like his taking a look at what happened in the 2020 election after Ward found irregularities after the audit, that Maricopa Cty didn’t cooperate in.
possible... lol
Rats cheat — Rats are scum
Has irregularities ever led to the other candidate winning?
GW Bush?
Make sure BRIAN RAMIREZ doesn't go anywhere near the Maricopa voting machines:
They should also look at why a woman running for governor is in charge of counting to votes in the first place.
And why there were no vote counting problems in the primary, but they all happened in the general, mainly in Republican areas.
Wait until the AZ Secretary of state weighs in on the subj.......... Oh, never mind
Trump’s running mate?
Pretty much.
Right now in the race for Attorney General of Arizona the margin is only 570 votes in favor of the Democrat and still votes out there in all counties not just the D ones.
Ooooh, A strongly worded letter.
That’ll set them straight.
“ Ooooh, A strongly worded letter.”
Perhaps Hans Brix can sort them out
This all goes away in January if the Dem is elected AG in a race that the 2 candidates are separated by a few 100 votes. I don’t think the new AG would be too interested in investigating her party slate’s voting fraud
Don’t hold your breath.
BTTT
Let’s peel off the cheat in Senate races.....Nev’’s Laxalt for one lost by a hair.
Sternly worded letter to be ignored in 3, 2, 1
It’s almost like she understands the implications, and used the word ‘lawful’, indicating an understanding of the plenary powers between state legislatures and Congress. She may understand that an unlawful fed election can cost a state it’s repesentation in Congress, and whatever terms Congress wants to add to allow the state to gain back its representation in Congress.
Clueless much? She presented a statement that indirectly referenced a potential loss of representation for the state in Congress if the state is found to have disenfranchised all its voters due to the mistakes she listed. She has labeled the election by Hobbs UNLAWFUL, depending on the explanations she requested. If that label stands, then quo warrantos can be used to remove any officeholders as a result of the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.