Posted on 11/15/2022 1:18:29 PM PST by Callahan
grey_whiskers wrote:
“
From patriots.win:
Supreme Court 22-380, received on 10/24/22: PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Take a look at all the names...Biden, Kamala, Pence, Pelosi, plus MANY others...the swamp is officially in the SOTUS hands as we speak.
The website *is* supremecourt.gov; I have verified the link independently.
“
https://m.facebook.com/groups/657587934788413/permalink/1227018464512021/
Who’s this lady at the AZ vote counting center?
Believe me. He’s flown in much worse weather.
“I SUSPECT something big going to break.I am hoping he provides some actual proof of voting fraud that space force collected in 2020 “
Actual proof of voting fraud in 2020 has existed for two years but nothing has changed. Nothing PDJT could say or show tonight will do a bit of good.
Nah. He’ll find a way to convert it.
That is one horribly written Writ. Explains nothing and, sorry, but the author has no legal standing. This Writ will not survive.
Sorry about reply 45. It should read: You need to add a sarcasm tag to that post.
Believe me. He’s flown in much worse weather.
I have no way of knowing that.
Supreme Court 22-380, received on 10/24/22: PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Take a look at all the names...Biden, Kamala, Pence, Pelosi, plus MANY others...the swamp is officially in the SOTUS hands as we speak.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Edify the ignorant... what is the implication? I see the names, but who is asking for this and what are they asking?
“Diehard pro-Trump Rep. Matt Gaetz canceled his plans to attend the former president’s launch of his 2024 campaign Tuesday night”
What makes the write think that’s what TRump’s announcement will be? Trump hasn’t said what it will be other than “Hopefully TODAY will turn out to be one of the most important days in the history of our Country!”
Announcing a 2024 does not fit that description.
1) Does the author need to be an AZ state senator or representative?
2) does the same hold true in a presidential election, which one must the plaintiff be, a US senator, US representative or a presidential candidate?
Like the 2020 3rd party presidential candidate in WI or MI?
What time is the announcement?
The person asking for this "the petitioner" is Raland J. Brunson from Utah. He is representing himself.
This is the statement which basically outlines the case:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”). All the Respondents have taken the required Oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and as such they are liable for consequences when they violate the Oath of Office.
Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the Constitution and the United States, purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this, whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated, therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy. Because of Respondents intentional refusal to investigate this enemy, Petitioner Raland J Brunson (“ Brunson ”) brought this action against Respondents because he was seriously personally damaged and violated by this action of Respondents, and consequently this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of law.
Respondents
On January 6, 2021, the 117 th Congress held a proceeding and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”). Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the 2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice President of the United States under Amendment XII. During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and This fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.
Due to the fact that this case represents a national security breach on a unprecedented level like never before seen seriously damaging and violating Brunson and coincidently effects every citizen of the U.S.A. and courts of law. Therefore, Brunson moves this court to grant this petition, or in the alternative without continuing further, order the trial court to grant Brunson ’ s complaint in its fullest. Brunson ’s complaint is the mechanism that can immediately remove the Respondents from office without leaving this country vulnerable without a President and Vice President.
There is more at the original link but that is the general idea.
Thank you, even I get that. I doubt they’ll hear the case, but if they do... wow.
Yes he has never said what the big announcement is about.
Tropical storm??
(sighs)
click on the link; it’s a petition for the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari .
From the comments at the original patriots.win link:
What is the meaning of certiorari writ? The word certiorari comes from Law Latin and means “to be more fully informed.” A writ of certiorari orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it. The U.S. Supreme Court uses certiorari to select most of the cases it hears.’
The appeals court of 10th circuit originally dismissed this case. They are petitioning SC to get info on why it was dismissed in first place because there was ample evidence presented of election fraud when Pence was counting votes for election in 2020. They are arguing that the constitution says (and it does) that government has a duty to investigate and it didn’t. They also say the lower court used conflicting doctrines to dismiss the case and so are asking SC to render a judgement. ( This is just my own understanding after reading documents but this case is exactly what SC was designed for - fixing errors (according to the Constitution) that lower courts make).
Oh no! I’m concerned that Trump is losing too much support.
Well... good luck.
I think he’s right, but what do I know at this level.
I’m thinking this doesn’t go far, but I’d sure like to see
people wiping pie off their faces for the next 75 years.
Someone responded with info about the case, I did get what a writ is, but what it was about I didn’t know. I could have clicked it and I stand corrected... I will try to be less of a botheration.
:-)
According to Mr. Brunson, Defendants’ conduct has damaged him to the extent of $484 million for each of the six causes of action, for a total of $2.905 billion, which he requests be provided tax free. Additionally, Mr. Brunson requests: (1) the immediate removal of all Defendants from office; (2) that they never be able to collect any further pay from the United States for their official service in Congress or as President or Vice President; (3) that they never be able to again practice law or again serve as an elected office-holder in this country; (4) that they each be investigated for treason; and (5) that former president Trump be immediately inaugurated as President.
https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams-2
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.