Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

Supreme Court 22-380, received on 10/24/22: PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Take a look at all the names...Biden, Kamala, Pence, Pelosi, plus MANY others...the swamp is officially in the SOTUS hands as we speak.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Edify the ignorant... what is the implication? I see the names, but who is asking for this and what are they asking?


48 posted on 11/15/2022 2:50:32 PM PST by little jeremiah (Never worry about anything. Worry never solved any problem or moved any stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
but who is asking for this and what are they asking?

The person asking for this "the petitioner" is Raland J. Brunson from Utah. He is representing himself.

This is the statement which basically outlines the case:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”). All the Respondents have taken the required Oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and as such they are liable for consequences when they violate the Oath of Office.

Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the Constitution and the United States, purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this, whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated, therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy. Because of Respondents intentional refusal to investigate this enemy, Petitioner Raland J Brunson (“ Brunson ”) brought this action against Respondents because he was seriously personally damaged and violated by this action of Respondents, and consequently this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of law.

Respondents

On January 6, 2021, the 117 th Congress held a proceeding and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”). Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the 2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice President of the United States under Amendment XII. During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and This fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.

Due to the fact that this case represents a national security breach on a unprecedented level like never before seen seriously damaging and violating Brunson and coincidently effects every citizen of the U.S.A. and courts of law. Therefore, Brunson moves this court to grant this petition, or in the alternative without continuing further, order the trial court to grant Brunson ’ s complaint in its fullest. Brunson ’s complaint is the mechanism that can immediately remove the Respondents from office without leaving this country vulnerable without a President and Vice President.

There is more at the original link but that is the general idea.

52 posted on 11/15/2022 3:22:03 PM PST by Oorang (Politicians:-a feeble band of lowly reptiles who shun the light and who lurk in their own dens. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

(sighs)

click on the link; it’s a petition for the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari .

From the comments at the original patriots.win link:

What is the meaning of certiorari writ? The word certiorari comes from Law Latin and means “to be more fully informed.” A writ of certiorari orders a lower court to deliver its record in a case so that the higher court may review it. The U.S. Supreme Court uses certiorari to select most of the cases it hears.’

The appeals court of 10th circuit originally dismissed this case. They are petitioning SC to get info on why it was dismissed in first place because there was ample evidence presented of election fraud when Pence was counting votes for election in 2020. They are arguing that the constitution says (and it does) that government has a duty to investigate and it didn’t. They also say the lower court used conflicting doctrines to dismiss the case and so are asking SC to render a judgement. ( This is just my own understanding after reading documents but this case is exactly what SC was designed for - fixing errors (according to the Constitution) that lower courts make).


56 posted on 11/15/2022 3:39:34 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson