Posted on 11/12/2022 4:48:23 AM PST by marktwain
On November 7, 2022, one day prior to the mid-term elections, Judge Glenn T. Suddaby issued his decision about a preliminary injunction in the Antonyuk v. Hochul case. The case challenged the carry law of New York, passed as an emergency measure in response to the Bruen decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. This decision is relatively quick, as court decisions go. The case was filed on September 22, 2022, as the second attempt by the plaintiff to challenge the law.
Judge Suddaby’s order for a preliminary injunction is a significant win for those who support the rights protected by the Second Amendment.
The preliminary injunction refines the list from the previous Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) by Suddaby, published on October 6. Some changes were made.
The preliminary injunction, issued on 7 November, is more detailed. It goes into effect immediately. Barring a reversal by an appeals court, it will not change until the case is concluded.
In dealing with the long list of “sensitive places,” Judge Suddaby found the plaintiffs did not have standing for several. The places where the plaintiffs lack standing were not considered in the preliminary injunction.
They may be argued in another case. The ban on carrying in these places continues pending litigation. They are:
p. 24: “[A]ny place owned or under the control of federal, state or local government, for the purpose of government administration, including courts.”
p. 35 libraries
p. 45 -47: “[T]he location of any program … that provides services to children, youth, … any legally exempt childcare provider …”
p. 47-48: summer camp
p. 50: “[T]he location of any program … regulated, … operated, or funded by the office for people with developmental disabilities”
(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...
All of those are likely to be challenged in another lawsuit.
I hope they challenge the new permit requirement for ALL semi automatic rifles.
Does anyone know if the social media history requirement is still part of the application process?
And is that only for social media accounts in the applicant’s own name? Can they demand phones to check for other accounts or comment accounts with alternative names?
/asking for a friend…
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.