I agree with Marjorie on this one.
I think it’s more likely the huge number of mail in votes for Lurch before the debate was the factor.
I’m sure some people reacted to Oz’s imperfections and the media slander of him.
However, there is no way that Doughhead Fetterman won on his merits.
I’m not in favor of baby murder.
Be blunt!
Yeah...either that or massive voter fraud. One of the two. I’ll go with massive voter fraud.
Oz wasn’t from PA ... and he didn’t have a D by his name.
Anyone who doubts the abortion debate today is largely about political power, on both sides, should read this article.
It's because "The Stupid Party" could not figure out that the Rats would take the wide-open no-controls no-checks mass-mail-in ballot policy left over (on purpose) from the Covid pandemic and drive 18 wheelers full of fake ballots through it.
How stupid does a party have to be not to see that 50% mail-in ballots for the Rats, vs. 10% for the GOP, did not "just happen" naturally and organically?
The Rats had the PA election won before election day. And other states as well.
It will take "The Stupid Part" weeks to figure it out. And they will be so afraid of being called "insurrectionist election deniers" that they won't even bring it up.
Why did Florida go 20 points for DeSantis? His handsome face? NO. Because FL outlawed mass-mail-in balloting, ballot harvesting, etc. To get a mail-in ballot in FL, you have to specifically request it, in writing, with ID proof. No mass-mail-in balloting, no Rat mass cheating.
No. He lost because he ran a bad campaign and treated his supporters like sad b******* by trying to manipulate them with endless appeals to sympathy.
Doug Mastriano was suitably unambiguous on his pro-life stance, yet he lost by a far larger margin
Oz lost because he chose to run as a Republican in a statewide race in Pennsylvania.
Or the Left just cheated, again.
She may be right, but for pro-life voters to withhold their votes from Oz for that reason is pretty shortsighted. No matter how mushy Oz was on this issue, there is no way he would ever be worse than Fetterman. Oz might come around on this issue. The are no pro-life Democrats that I know of. There was one in Illinois, Rep. Dan Lipinski, but he was booted out by the “progessives” in the 2020 primary. His pro-life stance was one of the major reasons why his own party wanted him out.
He was a terrible candidate all around. A Hollyweird carpetbagger who presented himself as the ultimate mushy-middle candidate. Zero fire in the belly. Conservatives in PA didn’t come out for him and I can’t really blame them. He was a nose-holder at best.
Mastriano was consistently pro-life, and list by a wider margin than Oz.
Not being pro-life is just ONE thing.
He lives in Bergen Co., NJ. Pennsylvania people prefer their pols to be from PA. They’re funny that way.
He joined the Turkish Army instead of the USA Army.
He’s Muslim.
Endorsing Oz was one of PDJT’s biggest blunders.
He should have said simply that he would respect and abide by the ruling of the SC in Dobbs. Then tear into the lying democrats who were telling gullible women that the republicans were going to ban abortion completely nation wide. You can thank a-hole Graham for giving the rats that issue as a free gift. But yeah Oz made a bad rookie error on abortion.
Oz lost barely and he had no help from the governor’s race like everybody else did. Banning abortion my number one issue Mastriano lost by 14. Oz would have won with a different gov candidate who could raise money and who wanted to campaign.
And John Fetterman is? Fool-headed reason.
All Dr Oz had to do was say, as a doctor, he can do no harm. Abortion is a violation of his principles.
He lost because Republicans spent more time making fun of his sroke than talking about Fettermans absolutely horrible policies.