Posted on 10/30/2022 3:17:55 PM PDT by McGruff
Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter, tweeted out a since-deleted, unfounded and anti-LGBTQ conspiracy theory Sunday morning about the attack on the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi from a website that has a history of publishing false information.
Musk responded to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when she tweeted out an L.A. Times story about how the suspect in the attack on Paul Pelosi, David DePape, spread far-right conspiracy theories.
Clinton tweeted the link to that story along with the message: "The Republican Party and its mouthpieces now regularly spread hate and deranged conspiracy theories. It is shocking, but not surprising, that violence is the result. As citizens, we must hold them accountable for their words and the actions that follow.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
The FBI is manufacturing a crime for Musk as we speak.
Expect the 2 am Gestapo raid on his home soon.
Didn’t he just Tweet about a story that had appeared in a California newspaper?
This article is such convoluted trash I can’t even follow their storyline. They seem to be attacking Musk for answering a tweet by Hillary in which she blamed republicans for the attack?
Butt, butt, butt, it’s the seriesness of the charge.
LSM needs to prove it’s false.
pretty sure he pulled it and it may be because the link to the site he posted got swamped and wouldn’t load so it made it look like the source pulled the article (but they didn’t).
Don’t neglect the possibility that the third person and DePape were working together. Person3 could have let DePape into the house.
It’s obvious the left wing fascist now believe they have a lock on what used to be free speech so now anyone who dares to make comments they don’t agree with will be savaged as some kind of threat to democracy. How about just letting people say whatever the h*** they want because that’s what free speech is all about.
Musk likely has the inside dirt on a lot of the so called “elites.”
What’s anti-LGBT about it?
Doesn’t he have free speech too?
Anyway, i just do not buy that there wasn’t sufficient security to keep some hippy out of the home’s back door. But Nancy obviously doesn’t have enough security on the back door that matters....
It looks like it would be hard for a man to climb through that broken window without cutting himself. And wouldn’t the smashed window trigger an alarm at a pricey mansion, alerting their security provider? But Pelosi had to make a call, sometime later, which was initially described as a “wellness” call, or something to that effect, not a break-in.
The whole thing reminds me of the crowbar assassination from Soylent Green
Unlike the decade of unfounded quackery these Pravda types have pushed unrelentlessly.
Wouldn’t that be something to be proud of? š¤”
As citizens, we must hold them accountable for their words and the actions that follow.
%\
Sounds like inciting a vigilante mob to me.
Mobocracy in action .
Lol!!
Break window, reach in, unlock door maybe?
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, well Iāll be damn. Itās a duck. The crap the Dems are selling aināt going very far. Biden, Fetterman, Paul Pelosi are obvious šš©.
Unfounded does have way of turning into founded all of a sudden.
The libs are freaking out because they can’t silence Musk. I hope their little heads explode!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.