[conservative98]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Jz1TjCphXE

Thanks for playing, Liz.

[Jewbacca]

Well, that’s a new level of incompetence.

[Flick Lives]

In theory, he has said he is willing to testify. However, there is no actual subpoena.

—

Would not be the least bit surprised for the corrupt FBI to do a midnight raid to arrest Trump for not honoring a subpoena that was never served.

[thegagline]

This article is absolute nonsense.

The subpoena can be served personally upon Trump. It can also be served upon someone over 18 and competent at his residence.

If the residence is guard gated, service can be effectuated upon the guard.

Servive can also take place by publication.

[NWFree]

Don’t tell them just keep them guessing and chasing their tails

[FlingWingFlyer]

LOL! Even if they could identify him/her, he/she could change their identify at the drop of a hat. I love this country! Identities are very flexible in the Banana Republica America.

[ClearCase_guy]

I get the feeling that the Democrats want “the subpoena” to be in the news, but they just don’t want to serve it because they just don’t want Trump to testify. They want him to get bad press. Because, you know, he’s literally Hitler.

[Chewbarkah]

It’s almost as if the Committee doesn’t want Trump to testify... Offered Pelosi the National Guard but she declined. Called for peaceful protest. Massive evidence of election fraud. Oops.

[Jeff Chandler]

Wait. If they serve the subpoena to a women, and the woman turns out to be a man, and the man changes back into a man, how does that affect the documentation?

[joshua c]

they want to hurt Trump’s campaign

and fish for a process crime

nothing to do with J6

[Vermont Lt]

They don’t have his address?

[frank ballenger]

They could bring back the TV show I’ve Got A Secret.
Panelists try to identify the real lawyer among phonies.

[hanamizu]

“... the committee voted unanimously to subpoena Trump...”

---

This would be the same committee all of whose members voted to impeach President Trump, right? So their unanimity isn’t such a big deal, is it?

[pfflier]

Sounds like they are getting a lot of negative polling numbers over this.

[libh8er]

Make no mistake. This is their ‘exit ramp’ once Trump demanded live coverage with no editing.

[lee martell]

Rest assured, if goofball ex Trump lawyer Michael Cohen knows who that attorney is or might be, he will be in touch.

[dirtymac]

They want the Subpoena itself to get the headlines. They do not want Trump to actually testify. That would be embarrassing to have the truth told in committee.

[philman_36]

After reading the replies you have to wonder just how incompetent these people really are.

Are they that out of touch with reality?

[PTBAA]

If served, Trump should claim the subpoena is invalid because they got his pronouns wrong.

[unlearner]

He’ll be happy to swing by and pick it up in person on 1/6/2023.

(The committee membership might experience a slight change and
have the opportunity to revisit their mission.)