Posted on 10/05/2022 4:50:54 AM PDT by JonPreston
So you can find the dog whistle fascism in the word neocon. But a Nazi militia marching down the street in uniforms, carrying torches and posters of Bandera, with SS and hitler tattoos, throwing Nazi salutes. Latvia having a SS Veterans Day… And the connection escapes you.
Great analysis! Lol
Calling BS on that one. Russia had a lot of options including allowing Russian citizens to return to native Russia. But Putin wanted the oil reserves of Crimea.
I always thought neo-con was code for “leftist warmonger”, don’t recall the bushes or cheneys being jewish they always came off as new england wasps. Also globohomo was a contraction of global homogenization, nothing to do with gays, which is what the wef is pushing us towards
🤮
This US Freeper very much appreciates it.
But of course you do.
Thanks.
There’s a disappointingly large amount of Russian propaganda posted on Free Republic.
Exactly. Antisemitism doesn’t surprise me on the left, given that they are aligned with jihadists. It does not surprise me that people who are antinomian would hate the people of Moses. It does bother me that people who support Putin and some, like Nick Fuentes deny the Holocaust, it bothers me that these people claim to represent conservatism or Americanism. And calling everyone a “homo” isn’t exactly a winning argument. It can be reasonable to discuss what, if any, involvement we should have with Ukraine. But the worship of Putin, sometimes a hint or more of antisemitism, and the knee-jerk response to everything does not belong with anything I recognize as conservatism.
* October - Putin redrew his map in crayon, so Ukraine is invading Russia now!
Love it!
“Also globohomo was a contraction of global homogenization, nothing to do with gays, which is what the wef is pushing us towards.”
You haven’t been paying attention to how the term is used on this website, have you?
What’s amazing to me is that some posters repeat the same, tired graphics ad nauseam deluding themselves that somehow their act is still cutting edge.
“Thanks for researching Oriental Review. People just take things that support their side, not knowing or caring if it is Russian (or for that matter Ukrainian) propaganda.”
My view is: People just take things that SEEM TO (say all
the right words to) support their side, not knowing or caring what or who the source is/might be and once knowing the source what their real agenda is.
In Iran, before and during 1979, Khomeini and his group obtained alliance with nearly all the above and underground political groups opposed to the Shah - they said all the right things to obtain those partners in what THEY sold, and others bought, as a “broad coaltion”. But in spite of the existance of the “broad coaltion”, Khomwinis group, having formed it, never lost control of it. And after power was obtained, by Khomeinis group, over the next several years most all the leaders and many of the lower level members of the “coalition partners” were either politically sidelined, or sent into asylum in other countries, to avoid being arrested and jailed, or directly killed.
The “broad coaltion” succeeded in deposing the Shah, but it wss Khomeini, not the “broad coalition” that becacme the new power over all things in Iran.
Knowing your friends depends on more than just seeing their seeming agreement on some individual issue. Knowing their background and other things they are or have been a part of or connected to can reveal their true agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.