Posted on 10/04/2022 1:11:03 PM PDT by SES1066
US Supreme Court 1st hearing on 3 October 2022.
The case revolves around Michael and Chantell Sackett who bought a soggy plot of land near Priest Lake, Idaho in 2004.
With the intention of building a home on the property, they began back-filling the low lying wet area.
The EPA stepped in, claiming they were interfering with protected wetlands.
(Excerpt) Read more at ky3.com ...
“Even wetlands that appear dry at times for significant parts of the year — such as vernal pools— often provide critical habitat for wildlife adapted to breeding exclusively in these areas.”
= = =
Well, isn’t a large swath of Florida now wetlands?
Navigable, even, for a short while (boats piled up prove that).
So, can no one rebuild there?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.