[RummyChick]

Since you seem to have a problem grasping the concept...new technology doesn’t trump peerage law

https://www.tatler.com/article/surrogacy-and-peerages-legal-issues-family-law-marchioness-of-bath

It may well be the everyone involved in Archie’s titles puts it on a back burner until such time as everyone in Williams family dies in a plane crash and suddenly Archie could be King.

But he is still not yet a Prince...Charles is holding off..perhaps as blackmail to get Harry to straighten up

[nickcarraway]

I don't agree with a lot that Megan Markle says and does, but whatever she did, she wasn't involved in the Rotherham child exploitation scandal, like the British royal family was. From the 1980s to the 2010s at least 1,400 children were sexually abused (by Muslims). I looked, and I can't find any evidence that Queen Elizabeth, (then) Prince Charles, or any other member of the royal family commented on it publicly, or lifted a finger to help. These are their subjects! I regard their failure to mention it, I regard as them covering it up. As the the royal family, this was definitely something they could have done. They viewed protecting Muslims as more important than protecting children. 4

Besides that, Queen Elizabeth bestowed the OBE and KCSG on Jimmy Saville. He was a friend and advisor to Prince Charles, and his advice extended to Queen Elizabeth. And they were privy to all kinds of rumors about him.

As the monarch and royal family of the U.K., they had absolutely no interest in protecting the children of the U.K.

So, whatever Megan Markle did, she is light years better than the royal family.

[nickcarraway]

Rotherham whistleblower's horror at police treatment of CSE allegations Don't "rock the multicultural boat."

[Jamestown1630]

He seems to have a problem grasping a number of concepts. (I’m still trying to figure out what his posts 59 and 60 have to do with your 52...)