Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Special Master Reveals New Plan After Appeals Court Ruling: Wants a government official to swear that the government properly listed items taken from Trump’s home in August
Epoch Times ^ | 09/23/2022 | Zachary Steiber

Posted on 09/23/2022 8:44:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The judge designated as the special master in former President Donald Trump’s records case has proposed that a government official swear that the government properly listed items taken from Trump’s home in August.

U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie, the special master, also left open the possibility of recommending the government be ordered to return some of the seized materials.

Dearie outlined the plan on Sept. 22, following an order that blocks him and Trump’s lawyers from accessing materials with classified markings that were taken from Trump’s home in Palm Beach, Florida.

Dearie, a George W. Bush appointee, was chosen by Trump attorneys and Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers and put into place by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee. Trump and the DOJ can object to components of the plan; Cannon would adjudicate any objections.

Declaration

Dearie’s case management plan starts with having a government official “with sufficient knowledge of the matter” submitting a declaration or affidavit regarding an inventory list DOJ officials have released.

The official would attest that the list “represents the full and accurate extent of the property seized from” from Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Florida residence.

If the plan is put into place, Trump would then respond with a list of any items listed by the government that were not seized from Mar-a-Lago.

Trump would also detail items that were seized but not included in the inventory.

“This submission shall be Plaintiff’s final opportunity to raise any factual dispute as to the completeness and accuracy of the Detailed Property Inventory,” Dearie said.

The government would then be allowed to respond to Trump.

Seized Materials

Based on an appeals court order, Cannon earlier Tuesday blocked Dearie and Trump lawyers from viewing the roughly 100 materials that were marked classified and seized from Mar-a-Lago.

Dearie and the Trump attorneys are still poised to review each page of non-classified materials taken from the resort.

Dearie wants the government to list each document and say whether the government filter team identified the document as potentially covered by a form of privilege, such as attorney-client privilege. Trump’s team has already received an initial set of potentially privileged documents, according to Dearie. After Trump’s team reviews the materials, they would specify any privilege claims, including any claims for documents that were not deemed potentially privileged by the government. Dearie will resolve any disputes on privilege.

The final log of privilege designations is due to Dearie on or before Oct. 21.

Delay on Ruling

The special master will not decide whether Trump shall receive any of the seized materials back until after Cannon rules on any objections to his plan.

Trump has already motioned for the return of property.

Trump must submit a brief in support of the motion no less than seven days after Cannon finishes ruling on the case management plan and any objections. The government will then respond, and Trump can respond to the government’s response.

Either party can request an oral argument.

Dearie said that he will “promptly issue a report and recommendation after briefing and oral argument has been completed.” Cannon has the final say on the motion.

Read more here...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biden; crime; fbi; maralago; pdjt; plantedevidence; raid; specialmaster; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2022 8:44:19 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Asking a bunch of liars who lied to the judge that is asking for them to swear they’re telling the truth this time.

Sounds like a plan!


2 posted on 09/23/2022 8:47:00 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

exactly- the lying liars are asked to swear that they didn’t lie- of course swearing and oaths mean nothing to lying liars-


3 posted on 09/23/2022 8:51:57 PM PDT by Bob434 (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As if they wouldn’t lie.


4 posted on 09/23/2022 8:59:00 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every leftist is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

whoever signs that, well...


5 posted on 09/23/2022 9:01:24 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wants a government official to swear that the government properly listed items taken from Trump’s home in August>>> Hey special idiot. They are liars.


6 posted on 09/23/2022 9:08:57 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

If the plan is put into place, Trump should then respond with a list of
items NOT listed by the government and that were not seized from Mar-a-Lago.

Get it?


7 posted on 09/23/2022 9:38:38 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Judge Dearie says that he wants another Judge to help him with his job...Former U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein. My feeling is, if he isn’t qualified to do the job by himself, why was he chosen?


8 posted on 09/23/2022 9:43:56 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trumps decisions are so frustrating at times.


9 posted on 09/23/2022 9:54:31 PM PDT by roving ( Pronouns- libs/suk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The originating agency should be asked to mark each document declassified if possible or give a document specific reason.


10 posted on 09/23/2022 10:04:59 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

There are 11,000 documents.

What bothers me is that the way this is going there is a tier of justice for rich people (Trump) and a different tier for regular folk. Why in the world does Trump have to pay Dreary’s salary and now the assistant judge who will be paid at $500/hour for at least 90 days?

Only a rich person could afford that . To make justice a level field, Trump should not have to pay for anything, his bill should be zero.


11 posted on 09/23/2022 10:07:02 PM PDT by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All but 700 pages should be handed back to Trump.

Dearie can sort through the 700 disputed pages himself.

Pile 1 - probably marked right
Pile 2 - probably should be marked declassified


12 posted on 09/23/2022 10:10:21 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toughluck_freeper
"To make justice a level field, Trump should not have to pay for anything, his bill should be zero."

The FBI should be made to pay for both of the Judges since they were the ones who raided his house, and took all those documents without disclosing what they had actually taken. Hell, when I worked in NY State Corrections, if you searched an inmate's cell, he was allowed to be present while you did it, and if you confiscated anything, you had to give him a signed receipt listing everything you took. I don't know how the FBI gets away with helping themselves to anything they want from someone's property, and not being required to provide a detailed list of everything they have taken before they, and the stuff they confiscate leaves the property.

13 posted on 09/23/2022 10:15:42 PM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nothing should have been removed except if it met the requirements of the warrant.


14 posted on 09/23/2022 10:17:13 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
"why was he chosen?

Judge derriere? The choice of the asses.
15 posted on 09/23/2022 10:34:11 PM PDT by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And, a government judge is going to decide whether the government overstepped its lawful powers.


16 posted on 09/24/2022 2:16:06 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

Make it a pinky swear! That way its most honest to goodness swearing!

What the hell have we turned into? Liars swear to anything...means nothing to them.


17 posted on 09/24/2022 3:49:26 AM PDT by Adder (ALL Democrats are the enemy. NO QUARTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY
Seems like a lot of people on this thread don’t understand how a legal process works.

The purpose of the oath or affirmation in this case isn’t to establish that something is, in fact, TRUE. It’s to identify the specific points of fact where the two opposing parties are presenting conflicting information.

Imagine a lawsuit between two drivers who were involved in a car accident. Driver #1 states that he was driving at the posted speed limit of 35 mph and drove into the intersection when the light was green. Driver #2 states that Driver #1 may have been driving at the posted speed limit, but that the light was red when he entered the intersection.

The judge in the case uses these two statements to establish that the speed of the vehicle driven by Driver #1 is not relevant to the case because it’s not a fact in dispute. The only matter for the court to consider would be whether the light was red or green when Driver #1 entered the intersection.

18 posted on 09/24/2022 4:41:41 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Pile 3:

FBI were in the areas with no Trump lawyers or staff allowed inside to observe.

So pile three will be pages brought in by the FBI and planted.

Because of Pile 3, the whole “case” must be thrown out and all documents returned to Maralego.

Even Pile 3, which need to be marked “Planted by FBI.”

To be used as evidence in the prosecution of the FBI and Biden and his Cabinent members involved or having knowledge of the crimes.


19 posted on 09/24/2022 5:09:28 AM PDT by Syncro (God is Good - Facts is Facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Yeah. The law. Lol.


20 posted on 09/24/2022 5:32:05 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson