Jan. 6 panel races to put together legislative proposal

The hill ^ | 09/17/2022 | Rebecca Beitsch

[ChicagoConservative27]

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol is eyeing a laundry list of tasks as it seeks to pull together a legislative package to prevent future insurrections.

The committee for months has touted the legislative purpose to its investigation — a key detail as various subpoena recipients have sought to skirt compliance with the panel.

[ChicagoConservative27]

This is a Stalinist crock of BEEP

[euram]

Do their proposals start with “no one should openly steal an election via collusion with Big Tech, Big Media, and changing voting laws that violate state constitutions”?

[A Navy Vet]

"future insurrections."

Still the "insurrection" BS.

[Libloather]

Put Pelosi’s fence back up - for the third time?

[Recovering_Democrat]

...pull together a legislative package to prevent future insurrections.

There was no insurrection from Trump supporters on January 6.

[Billthedrill]

Gotta keep the lie alive. No better way than to put legislation around it.

[M Kehoe]

These Capital creatures have no idea what an insurrection is.

Until they get the Ceaușescu treatment.

5.56mm

[Steve_Seattle]

" . . . as it seeks to pull together a legislative package to prevent future insurrections."

Rebecca Beitsch is a slack-jawed, lying moron. Whether it's an "insurrection" or any other crime, how does writing a law prevent crime from happening? Laws define and punish crime, they do not magically prevent crime from happening. Exactly how would a new law prevent an "insurrection"?

[Chgogal]

Pitiful. Shameful. Unacceptable.

[Toespi]

How many Trump supporters were around the Capitol on J6? Maybe a couple hundred thousand? If they were there for an insurrection, it would have happened, they might still be there today. instead a couple hundred dribbled into the building, one person being murdered by a Biden supporter and she was unarmed.

[BitWielder1]

Legislation based on a false premise can not possibly be good.

[StAnDeliver]

Politico woman Betsy Woodruff Swan snapped Tuck Chodd's neck like a chicken when Tuck begged-the-question about the agitpoop flowing from the J6 Comintern and she said flat out, "Nobody gives a €^(%". Eat it, Tuck Chodd:

“Does the Jan. 6 hearing break through at all?" anchor Chuck Todd asked after he noted polling that shows most Republicans think Trump truly believed there was widespread fraud in the 2020 election.

“I don’t think it does. I've talked to two separate Democratic members of Congress in the last couple weeks about Jan. 6 — obviously, I can’t say who — and both of them have said, offhandedly, nobody gives a bleep about Jan. 6 when they are talking about their districts and the way that elections play out," she said."

[philman_36]

She cited Trump’s dereliction of duty in watching the riot unfold while doing little if anything to stop it, saying, “We are evaluating whether our criminal laws should be enhanced to apply more consequences to this type of behavior.”

In fond memory of the SNL of old...Liz, you ignorant slut.

You need to step up to the DC mayor before you go anywhere else. She didn't request the NG troops and refused them when they were offered to her beforehand.

[Doulos1]

They can’t beat Trump, so they must put him in jail.

[4Liberty]

[lurk]

If they had something, they would have leaked it by now.

[Gene Eric]

The J6 committee is the Insurrection.

[SisterK]

Legislation based on a false premise can not possibly be good.

agree
laying the framework for persecution

[Engedi]

But nothing about Pelosi’s dereliction of duty to protect the capital, which is under her charge along with both Sgt of Arms. Trump offered 10K national guards, it was refused.

[kallisti]

Will they call it the Enabling Act?