Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge denies DOJ request for stay in investigation of Trump's Mar-a-Lago docs
ABC News ^ | Sept 15, 2022

Posted on 09/15/2022 6:06:28 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday denied the Department of Justice's request for a partial stay of her ruling that enjoined the FBI from using roughly 100 documents seized from Mar-a-Lago with classification markings in its ongoing criminal investigation of Donald Trump -- and mandated they be handed over to a special master for review.

Cannon has also appointed Raymond Dearie, senior district judge for the Eastern District of New York, as special master.

In a filing last week that amounted to a line-by-line rebuke of Cannon's ruling, DOJ prosecutors wrote that they would seek intervention by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals if she declined to act on their request for a partial stay by the end of Thursday....../

Judge denies DOJ request for stay in investigation of Trump's Mar-a-Lago docs

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aileencannon; doj; maralago; trump; trumpinvestigation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
What is the classification of this picture:

Judge denies DOJ request for stay in investigation of Trump's Mar-a-Lago docs

I assume the original photo would have to classified TS-SCI which was the point of the DOJ photo. However, where are the downgrade data? DOJ (and FBI) has no authority to downgrade classification. So unless I am mistaken the only authority to downgrade the photo would be the POTUS.

Where are the downgrade instructions?

1 posted on 09/15/2022 6:06:28 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The DOJ must despise this judge for daring to side with Trump.

That little threat of theirs to go to the Circuit Court if she didn’t jump through their hoop today, is the kind of insulting behavior judges do not appreciate.

The DOJ is playing this like real scumbags. Do they really believe that in these two year old presidential documents they are rushing to save the country from a security risk?

I doubt it.

These are privileged spoiled leftists and they are up to no good.


2 posted on 09/15/2022 6:16:11 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Cover sheets themselves are not classified.

The HUGE RED FLAG for me is that nearly all if not all of the cover sheets are PAPER-CLIPPED to the documents. This is a NO-NO because they will almost surely get caught and possibly mixed up or even detached when placed next to other docs in the file folder.

I think the FIB put those cover sheets on there TO ADD TO THE DRAMATIC EFFECT OF THE STAGED PHOTO. THIS IS TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, 101 !!!!!

3 posted on 09/15/2022 6:17:25 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

So they desperately want to investigate if someone else had access to these documents.

But these same pos have been running to the media and leaking the connect of the files.

Where is the urgent investigation into how those leaks are affecting national security?


4 posted on 09/15/2022 6:20:27 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Nice carpet. Wanna get something like that for my den.


5 posted on 09/15/2022 6:21:49 PM PDT by Nashcash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

For an agency that ALWAYS avoids hard questions by saying “we don’t discuss ongoing investigations”, they SURE ARE EAGER TO SHOW PHOTOGRAPHS FROM THEIR ARMED HOME INVASION OF MAR-A-LAGO!


6 posted on 09/15/2022 6:23:07 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I hate our democrat controlled Federal government and don’t give a crap about government “classified information” getting out to the public.
Most of what our government does is corrupt so they hide their corruption behind “national security”(Many people eat this crap up)

Our next opponents in the next big war will be China, Russia, and Persia.

Those three countries already know what we have because globalists already gave or sold it to them over the last 30-40 years.

Right now Washington DC cares about two things:

1) Taking out MAGA.

2) Making sure our ‘strategic partnership’ with our Ukraine ally moves forward, regardless of the cost to the US Treasury.


7 posted on 09/15/2022 6:24:01 PM PDT by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Regarding the special master, I believe Durham is available.


8 posted on 09/15/2022 6:30:10 PM PDT by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Dearie was one of the FISA judges that approved the bogus Russiagate warrant.


9 posted on 09/15/2022 6:35:10 PM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

“Cover sheets themselves are not classified.”

True, but these coversheets are not by themselves, they are covering documents that supposedly have that classification.

There are basically 2 scenarios:

1. The documents classification underneath the coversheets was accurately reflected, which means the photo should have been classified TS-SCI.

2. The documents were not classified as shown and therefore this was a DOJ photo op to influence the case.

The FBI has no authority WRT classification. So that leaves 3 options:

1. The documents are assumed to be TS-SCI
2. This was a DOJ Photo Op to influence the courts.
3. Biden downgraded the photos.


10 posted on 09/15/2022 6:39:09 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Weissman and Elias are gnashing their teeth.


11 posted on 09/15/2022 6:42:21 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Putin is behaving rationally.The war is on Biden and Obama. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
The HUGE RED FLAG for me is that nearly all if not all of the cover sheets are PAPER-CLIPPED to the documents.

Agree. In 30 years I've never seen that done. Not once.

12 posted on 09/15/2022 6:43:13 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie ("We want no Gestapo or Secret Police. FBI is tending in that direction." - Harry Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Trying to stall so they can have a “bombshell” right before the mid terms.


13 posted on 09/15/2022 6:46:04 PM PDT by Pirate Ragnar (Hope coming from Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Maybe he can redeem himself by being honest this time.


14 posted on 09/15/2022 6:52:43 PM PDT by miserare ( Impeach Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: miserare

They lied to the judge re the warrant for carter page.


15 posted on 09/15/2022 7:11:43 PM PDT by gcparent (God Bless America )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gcparent

I didn’t know that, but am not surprised.


16 posted on 09/15/2022 7:18:10 PM PDT by miserare ( Impeach Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Another perspective is Dearie is one of the FISA judges the FBI lied to, and Dearie knows it now.


17 posted on 09/15/2022 7:28:51 PM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Obviously the DOJ has something to hide.

The swamp in action.

VOTE, DEMOCRATS OUT.


18 posted on 09/15/2022 7:52:57 PM PDT by Pearfect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

everywhere, I see it stated that Danchnenko was a paid informant for the FBI “from March 2017 to October 2020”, but not the date in October.

however, I’ve read elsewhere that FBI ended their relationship with Danchenko on the same date as Durham was appointed, and have tried to find the October date to prove this, but have failed so far. perhaps someone else can provide the info.

as for the date Durham was appointed, Wikipedia says October 19:

In December 2020, Barr revealed to Congress that he had secretly appointed Durham special counsel on October 19.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Durham#Appointments_as_special_investigator

15 Sept: Washington Examiner: Nunes implores Republicans to act on John Durham bombshell
by Daniel Chaitin
“If you recall, they were coming after me, saying that people were going to die if important assets — Putin assets were going to die. It was all nonsense,” Nunes said. “The dude was, like, a few blocks from here working at Brookings at one point as a Democratic operative. I mean, nobody — nobody — cared. This is the best evidence that I have seen that these guys were conspiring to do this.”

Nunes, who as a congressman was a lead investigator of what has become known as the Russiagate controversy, said he doesn’t know whether Durham will act on these findings as they relate to the Justice Department but argued there is a group of high-level officials dating back to the Obama administration who are out to get Trump...
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-republicans-john-durham-human-source


19 posted on 09/16/2022 4:06:01 AM PDT by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGAthon

if the dates coincide, it would explain why DOJ/FBI continue to attack Trump...to keep the focus off themselves.


20 posted on 09/16/2022 4:08:19 AM PDT by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson