Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Brown was once a GOP hero. Now his family’s political journey could end today
nbcnews.com ^ | 9/13/22 | Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, Ben Kamisar, Bridget Bowman and Alexandra Marquez

Posted on 09/13/2022 10:39:35 AM PDT by cotton1706

It’s been quite a political journey for Scott Brown and his family, and that journey could very well come to an end in today’s N.H. 01 GOP primary.

In 2010, Brown pulled off a stunning upset in Massachusetts, winning the Senate seat held by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy and ending the Democrats’ filibuster-proof majority.

In 2012, he lost the Senate seat to Democrat Elizabeth Warren.

In 2014, he switched states — from Massachusetts to New Hampshire — to challenge Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H. He lost, but the issues he used in that campaign’s closing days (immigration, ISIS and Ebola) served as a precursor to Donald Trump’s presidential run the next year.

In 2017, Trump nominated Brown as U.S. ambassador to New Zealand, and he served in that post for four years.

And in 2022, wife Gail Huff Brown — a former prominent Boston-area TV news reporter — is running for the GOP nomination in New Hampshire’s 1st Congressional District, where she’s been running ads supporting abortion rights.

And where she appears to be trailing Republicans Matt Mowers and Karoline Leavitt for the right to challenge Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H., in the fall.

The potential takeaway from the Brown’s political journey over the last 12 years: They were too conservative for Massachusetts — save for that Tea Party-fueled upset in 2010.

And they maybe weren’t conservative enough to be a Republican in New Hampshire in 2022.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2022election; brown; chrispappas; chucktodd; cnbc; creepstate; deepstate; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2022; elections; electionz; electionzzz; elekchunz; elizabethwarren; fakenews; fiveauthors; gailhuffbrown; gopestablishment; jeanneshaheen; massachusetts; msnbc; nbc; nbcfakenews; newhampshire; newzealand; nobrainscollectively; policestate; rino; rinos; scottbrown; singlepartystate; uniparty; upchucktodd; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Oh look! Another 5-person article with Chuck Todd!

So I guess Chuck & the Gang REALLY wanted Gail Huff Brown to be the GOP nominee to continue the pantywaistery in Congress (or to make it easier for the Democrat to win). They're all teary-eyed.

1 posted on 09/13/2022 10:39:35 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I sent him $50 when he won the Ted Kennedy seat. Say what you want but 36 years(or so) was long enough. 2 years later we get Pocahontas. That’s ok. There will be another ambassadorship out there for him.


2 posted on 09/13/2022 10:44:46 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
In 2014, he switched states — from Massachusetts to New
Hampshire — to challenge Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H. He lost,
but the issues he used in that campaign’s closing days
(immigration, ISIS and Ebola) served as a precursor to Donald
Trump’s presidential run the next year.

Isn't that inferring this is where Trump got part of his
platform?

Maybe others see it differently, but I think that's painting
with a very broad bush.

Hogwash!

3 posted on 09/13/2022 10:46:11 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

He wasn’t a hero. He was voted in to stop Obamacare, but the he voted to move it forward. Republican have never forgotten his betrayal. Also, he ran as a phony populist.


4 posted on 09/13/2022 10:47:56 AM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

“In 2017, Trump nominated Brown as U.S. ambassador to New Zealand, and he served in that post for four years.”

Ohhh, plum job.


5 posted on 09/13/2022 10:48:22 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Isn’t that inferring this is where Trump got part of his
platform?

Maybe others see it differently, but I think that’s painting
with a very broad bush.

Hogwash!”

Golly gee, those running for office addressing issues of the day like immigration instead of pretend issues of 200 years from now like climate change. What a novelty!


6 posted on 09/13/2022 10:51:20 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Agreed...


7 posted on 09/13/2022 10:52:30 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Would prefer Levitt over Mowers.


8 posted on 09/13/2022 10:53:39 AM PDT by G Larry (Population Control means Killing Billions, not "limiting growth".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

Uhmmm...

Are you sure?

The Senate passed the original Obamacare bill BEFORE Scott won. Scott Brown won, but the Senate let the interim replacement, Paul Kirk, vote on Obamacare “Reconciliation”.

Remember that the Senate only had 59 votes to pass the Reconciliation Act since Republican Scott Brown replaced Democrat Ted Kennedy. Therefore in order to pass the Act Senate Democrats decided to change the rules. They declared that they could use the “Reconciliation Rule (this is a different “reconciliation” than the House bill). This rule was only supposed to be used for budget item approvals so that such items could be passed with only 51 votes in the Senate, not the usual 60. Reconciliation was never intended to be used for legislation of the magnitude of Obamacare. But that didn’t stop them.

So both of the “Acts” were able to pass both houses of Congress and sent to President Obama for his signature without a single Republican vote in favor of the legislation. The American system of governance was shafted. To quote Democrat Rep. Alcee Hastings of the House Rules Committee during the bill process: “We’re making up the rules as we go along.”


9 posted on 09/13/2022 10:54:21 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Carpetbaggers deserve to lose.


10 posted on 09/13/2022 10:54:52 AM PDT by Republican in occupied CA (I will not give up on my native State! Here I was born, here I fight and die!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

5 commies to write simple agitprop? No wonder their losing.


11 posted on 09/13/2022 10:54:55 AM PDT by gr8eman (Abortion! It's just a murderous ghoul thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

I campaigned and voted for him, because the alternative was so odious.

Then he did that. Boy, did I ever feel stupid and used. He can pound sand.


12 posted on 09/13/2022 10:55:02 AM PDT by rlmorel (Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

Why lie?

Weeks before Brown’s election, the Senate had already passed its version of health care reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, on Dec. 24, 2009, on a 60-39 vote.

The House passed the Senate bill on March 21, 2010. On that same day, the House passed a slew of their own measures in a separate bill, which the Senate passed March 25, 2010, through the filibuster-proof reconciliation process.


13 posted on 09/13/2022 10:58:40 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

His wife wants to kill babies?

I hope she loses BIG.


14 posted on 09/13/2022 11:00:15 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

Obastardcare..like the federal income tax, is unconstitutional.


15 posted on 09/13/2022 11:00:51 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

But he did not vote to pass it.

The democrats did that on their own.

I don’t understand why people are saying he voted for it, to pass it thru, or something like that.

He wasn’t given the opportunity.


16 posted on 09/13/2022 11:04:37 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

100% correct.

Then..Bart “skunk head” Stupak made a stink about it because of the abortion thing.

Skunk Head took a bow after he voted for it-that is after Obastard gave/promised him an EO on the abortion thing. He then took a bow and got to hell out of his district after which Doc Benishek got the seat. Doc Benishek..my former friend who I fought for tooth and nail to get him in.


17 posted on 09/13/2022 11:06:41 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: crz

How is the federal income tax unconstitutional, when the 16th amendment explicitly allows for the federal income tax?


18 posted on 09/13/2022 11:08:43 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

That bill was never reconciled between both houses.

It was deemed passed. If I remember right.


19 posted on 09/13/2022 11:08:56 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Read up on your history of how rotten that amendment was pushed through and all the SCOTUS rulings before about a federal income tax.

I aint gonna explain it.


20 posted on 09/13/2022 11:11:42 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson