Posted on 09/11/2022 8:08:16 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The US Supreme Court delivered a temporary victory for a Jewish university under assault by the alphabet people.
Yeshiva University in Manhattan is the oldest Jewish university in America. Like Catholic and other religious-based universities, It accepts students from all denominations and awards degrees in a variety of disciplines.
While inclusive, Yeshiva University expects all students to uphold certain orthodox Jewish practices on campus, such as observing rules concerning dietary restrictions and Shabbat.
As former RedState Erick Ericksson is fond of saying, “you will be made to care.” In 2020, a small number of Yeshiva students and alumni banded together to pummel the leadership of Yeshiva University into submission. They demanded that it approve as a “Pride Alliance” club. This would allow the club to use university facilities for grooming recruitment and meetings. When Yeshiva refused to go along with sanctioning a club dedicated to the antithesis of Judaism (and Christianity), they sued. The cause of action used by the LGBTQIA2S+ plaintiffs was that New York’s “public accommodations” law required Yeshiva to accommodate whatever bizarre sexual practices the “club” came up with. Shockingly, the alphabet people won.
Yeshiva lost at the lower court level when a trial judge focused on whether the University qualified as a religious corporation within the meaning of the New York City Human Rights Law, a public accommodation regulation that bars discrimination based on sexual orientation. The law expressly excludes certain religious corporations and Yeshiva argued that it fell under the exception.
The court noted, however, that according to an amendment to the school’s charter that was adopted in 1967, the university is considered an “educational corporation.”
“Yeshiva’s organizing documents do not expressly indicate that Yeshiva has a religious purpose,” Judge Lynn R. Kotler said in holding that Yeshiva is not exempt from the law.
The court also rejected the school’s claims that the NYCHRL violates Yeshiva’s First Amendment Rights holding that the public accommodations law is a neutral law with general applicability to all parties.
“It does not target religious practice, its intent is to deter discrimination, only, and it applies equally to all places of public accommodation other than those expressly exempted as distinctly private or a religious corporation organized under the education or religious law,” Kotler wrote.
The judge said that the challengers sought “equal access” and that the school “need not make a statement endorsing a particular viewpoint.” Kotler also noted that some of Yeshiva’s graduate schools allow LGBTQ groups, undercutting the university’s arguments.
Yeshiva is represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which has a damned strong track record on religious freedom cases. A short while ago, the US Supreme Court imposed a stay on the trial court order.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Friday afternoon granted, at least for now, a request by Yeshiva University to block a New York state court ruling that directed the university to approve an official “Pride Alliance” student club. The university, which has four campuses in New York City, had argued that complying with the state court’s ruling would violate its religious beliefs.
…
After the New York appeals courts declined to put the trial court’s ruling on hold, Yeshiva came to the Supreme Court, calling the ruling an “unprecedented intrusion into church autonomy.” The Supreme Court has long held, the university contended, that religious organizations have broad discretion to structure themselves “as they see fit ‘to assist in the expression and dissemination of any religious doctrine.’” Noting that the window for clubs to apply for recognition closes on Sept. 12, the university asked the justices to act quickly.
…
In her brief order on Friday afternoon, Sotomayor did not explain her decision to temporarily put the state trial court’s ruling on hold. However, the final sentence of her order, indicating that there could be further action on the university’s request, suggests that the court may have wanted to act at least preliminarily before the Sept. 12 deadline for clubs to apply for recognition.
To be charitable, the trial judge’s ruling was agenda-driven and flew in the face of commonsense and the First Amendment. It also stands in stark opposition to recent Supreme Court rulings of religious liberty in regard to education. Why she thought her ruling would stand is unfathomable unless the agenda was to create an opening in which the alphabet club could register and then make Yeshiva the bad guy when the Supreme Court got around to hearing the case, that is assuming the New York State appellate courts ever heard it.
It is a safe bet that Yeshiva will emerge victorious unless Joe Biden gets two more Supreme Court nominees by the time this case percolates its way up.
The circuits are divided among the justices for emergency rulings like this. I wonder what level of consultation takes places. Surely, given her own druthers, the wise Latina would not make this ruling
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/359597
… Nine friend-of-the-court briefs were drafted and filed in warp-speed time by law professors and by organizations. They include a brief by the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs (“COLPA”) on behalf of Jewish groups such as the Orthodox Union. The Archdiocese of New York, the Mormon Church and the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities also supported Yeshiva with friend-of-the-court briefs...
… In 1995, a unanimous Supreme Court declared that the organizers of a St. Patrick’s Day parade in Boston had the constitutional free-speech right to exclude the Irish-American, Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group from its parade.
Justice Souter, a liberal icon, said in the court’s opinion that the parade organizers had the right “to determine what message their activities convey to the public.”…
… The free-speech right was extended in 2000 in a Supreme Court decision affirming the right of the Boy Scouts of America to discharge an openly gay scout leader.
A court majority noted that the Scouts transmitted to the public an “expressive message” secured by the First Amendment. The scout leader’s conduct, said the court, was “inconsistent with the values” that the Scouts were seeking “to instill in its youth members” and “runs afoul of the Scouts’ freedom of expressive association.”…
bump
btt
stick that where the sun dont shine mentally ill gays!
There’s actually a controversy between religious Jews. Traditionalist who hold such students should never be allowed, and Modern Orthodox who wish to be seen as, well, modern and liberal. I believe when the first such students were known and admitted, a least a few of YU’s rabbis simply quit.
Traditionally religious choose places like Beth Medrash Govoha, which actually has more students and won’t have YU’s problem.
HALLELUJAH!!!
Civil Rights Laws have almost completely decimated the freedom of association and organizational messaging...THIS is what Barry Goldwater warned us about when he said he was against Civil Rights Laws!!
Oh, nose! Threaten the justices. Threaten the justices.
SCOTUS is doing a good job lately. They seem to understand the Constituion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.