Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charles III to be proclaimed King of Great Britain on Sat morning — Buckingham Palace
Tass ^ | 9/9/22 | Tass

Posted on 09/09/2022 9:38:47 AM PDT by hardspunned

LONDON, September 9. /TASS/. Charles III will be formally proclaimed King of Great Britain on the morning of Saturday, September 10th. As follows from a statement released by the Buckingham Palace, the Accession Council will meet in session at St. James’s Palace in London on Saturday at 10:00 local time (12:00 Moscow time) to proclaim the son of Elizabeth II as the UK’s new ruler.

First, the Privy Council, an advisory body under the monarch, will meet in the main chambers of the palace. Its members will announce the accession of Charles III to the throne, although in fact he became king at the moment his mother passed away. Then the successor of Elizabeth II will join his council to conduct the meeting. According to a three-century-old tradition, His Majesty will take a single oath relating to the security of the Church of Scotland (such was the condition of the Anglo-Scottish Union of 1707). The oath concerning the Church of England, of which the British monarch is the Supreme Head, will be pronounced later in the Parliament building.

(Excerpt) Read more at tass.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: charlesiii; charlestheturd; houseofwindsor; kciii; kingcharlesiii; ukroyals; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last
To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Me too. I was expecting George VII.


61 posted on 09/09/2022 10:40:57 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

My gov’t angers me enough that I am taxed to support them, but they so serve a sort of a purpose, at least. The “royals” are figureheads” as I understand it . It would pi$$ me off to support them.


62 posted on 09/09/2022 10:42:19 AM PDT by day10 (Are Britons taxed to support these people?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

“Taxed and how! All to support a bunch of inbred lay abouts who have ‘’royal blood’’.”

You need a lesson on English history.


63 posted on 09/09/2022 10:43:08 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ebenezer; Verginius Rufus

I think his pledge is to be “Defender of Faith” without “the”, as in not be an exclusivist in favor of the Church of England he is, technically, head of. It’s all this woke diversity stuff.

-

Yes. Defender of faith. That’s what he’s said in the past. Not Defender of The Faith.

Which to my mind means he’s not King.


64 posted on 09/09/2022 10:48:13 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Camilla gets to be Queen, but all future Royal Monarchs will be hers of Diana. Not bad at all.
65 posted on 09/09/2022 10:48:30 AM PDT by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Yep


66 posted on 09/09/2022 10:51:49 AM PDT by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

Oh my, and it was pretty much “Good luck in California, Harry and Meghan”


67 posted on 09/09/2022 10:52:32 AM PDT by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

I believe she was known as Lady Horseface. IIRC, the arrangement for Charles to marry her, was that when HM Queen Elizabeth II passed away, he would become King and Horseface would become ‘Princess consort’. I hope they stick with that and do not call her ‘Queen’. ‘Queen Horseface’ just doesn’t roll of the tongue.


68 posted on 09/09/2022 10:53:05 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian ( Ceterum autem censeo Justinius True-dope-us esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I am familiar with English history and they most certainly are “inbred layabouts”.


69 posted on 09/09/2022 10:53:22 AM PDT by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I don’t care about these privileged royals.


70 posted on 09/09/2022 10:57:53 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1787. Death Certificate - 2021. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hardspunned

I don’t care about these privileged royals.


71 posted on 09/09/2022 10:58:04 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1787. Death Certificate - 2021. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnz1

He didn’t bother to use their titles either.


72 posted on 09/09/2022 10:58:44 AM PDT by Cecily ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Free Ulster!


73 posted on 09/09/2022 11:01:14 AM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page help save my beloved dog's life. https://www.givesendgo.com/G2FUF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

Of all crazy things that came to mind, Ozzy was fixing to “move back home”.

I wonder if this will change his plans.


74 posted on 09/09/2022 11:03:38 AM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page help save my beloved dog's life. https://www.givesendgo.com/G2FUF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Ah, no I don't thank you. It's a blood soaked one where the royals are concerned and we had to chase them out of here twice in order to have a country.

Two generations of my family damned near lost their lives in two world wars fighting for the Brits so please , don't tell me about the Brits, over all I'm not too fond of them.

75 posted on 09/09/2022 11:03:40 AM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: day10
Mostly the royals bring in the tourists.
76 posted on 09/09/2022 11:04:28 AM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

I swear I’ve already seen the phrase “Queen consort” being used.

*gag*


77 posted on 09/09/2022 11:04:54 AM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page help save my beloved dog's life. https://www.givesendgo.com/G2FUF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Camilla ain’t no Eva Braun.

;D


78 posted on 09/09/2022 11:07:40 AM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page help save my beloved dog's life. https://www.givesendgo.com/G2FUF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

LOL!


79 posted on 09/09/2022 11:08:02 AM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: A Formerly Proud Canadian

80 posted on 09/09/2022 11:08:34 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson