Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors are spreading COVID disinformation. California needs to do something about it
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Sep. 6, 2022 | Seema Yasmin

Posted on 09/07/2022 6:31:00 AM PDT by artichokegrower

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: artichokegrower

HCQ without Zinc, Azithromycin, Vitamin D3, started within days of symptoms will NOT help.

Fauci ‘proved’ that HCQ was ineffective by using it without the other components on people hospitalized for Late COVID.

He was grasping at straws, because if IVM or HCQ with Zinc, etc. were effective, already approved by the FDA and cheap, the Emergency Use Authorization for untested or inadequately tested mRNA substances would be revoked.

Uttar Pradesh...241 Million people COVID FREE in 4 months.


21 posted on 09/07/2022 7:22:17 AM PDT by PsechsySr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
--- "The patient's wife was crying on the other end of the phone. It was 2020 and her husband was in the intensive-care unit with COVID. He was getting sicker each day, and the medicine their family doctor had prescribed 'might have stopped working,' she explained."

One observes the signature writing style which all these sorts of hand-wrigning "news" article begins. A personal anecdote intended to prove all by framing the subject in emotional distress.

One notes the insertion of a famous wiggle word into the prose. Might. Like all the modal equivalents, this news is about "might." Maybe. Could be. Experts say, on condition of anonymity, "possibly." And then the prose goes on to attack others for "misinformation."

When one states "might," the information is already "missed."

22 posted on 09/07/2022 7:28:15 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Been to drs in Ca. What a bunch of losers.


23 posted on 09/07/2022 7:35:05 AM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Several of my friends are taking HCQ. Some others are taking ivermectin. None of these friends, including me, have had any of the “bioweapon” shots and no one has gotten the China virus. Granted, this is a very small group. YMMV.

See tag.


24 posted on 09/07/2022 7:47:28 AM PDT by upchuck (The longer I remain unjabbed with the clot-shot, the more evidence I see supporting my decision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Seema Yasmin:


25 posted on 09/07/2022 8:04:42 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
“...For every epidemic, there is a clout-chasing snake oil salesperson touting fake cures...”

Toxic injections?

9/5/22

“Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up”

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4090947/posts

26 posted on 09/07/2022 8:25:47 AM PDT by 444Flyer (John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Meanwhile, paging Sacramento...

Anger at plans to roll back Covid vaccines to under-11s in England Children aged 5-11 will no longer be offered Covid jabs, except those in clinical risk groups, UKHSA confirms

27 posted on 09/07/2022 8:30:46 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Or the lie that a cloth mask can stop airborne virus particles?


28 posted on 09/07/2022 9:04:33 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

Ah, but just because the CDC admits it could work NOW doesn’t mean it worked BEFORE! I mean, the chemicals obviously magically changed when the CDC waved their wand of approval over the vat of HCQ!

/sarc


29 posted on 09/07/2022 9:05:51 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

‘It defines misinformation as “false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.”’

And who defines “contemporary scientific consensus”? There exists no body in the country that makes such definitions. None in the world that I am aware of. That’s just not how the scientific process works.

Law is begging to be struck down as too vague to enforce.


30 posted on 09/07/2022 9:10:52 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson