Posted on 09/07/2022 6:31:00 AM PDT by artichokegrower
The patient’s wife was crying on the other end of the phone. It was 2020 and her husband was in the intensive-care unit with COVID. He was getting sicker each day, and the medicine their family doctor had prescribed “might have stopped working,” she explained.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfchronicle.com ...
HCQ without Zinc, Azithromycin, Vitamin D3, started within days of symptoms will NOT help.
Fauci ‘proved’ that HCQ was ineffective by using it without the other components on people hospitalized for Late COVID.
He was grasping at straws, because if IVM or HCQ with Zinc, etc. were effective, already approved by the FDA and cheap, the Emergency Use Authorization for untested or inadequately tested mRNA substances would be revoked.
Uttar Pradesh...241 Million people COVID FREE in 4 months.
One observes the signature writing style which all these sorts of hand-wrigning "news" article begins. A personal anecdote intended to prove all by framing the subject in emotional distress.
One notes the insertion of a famous wiggle word into the prose. Might. Like all the modal equivalents, this news is about "might." Maybe. Could be. Experts say, on condition of anonymity, "possibly." And then the prose goes on to attack others for "misinformation."
When one states "might," the information is already "missed."
Been to drs in Ca. What a bunch of losers.
Several of my friends are taking HCQ. Some others are taking ivermectin. None of these friends, including me, have had any of the “bioweapon” shots and no one has gotten the China virus. Granted, this is a very small group. YMMV.
See tag.
Toxic injections?
9/5/22
“Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up”
Or the lie that a cloth mask can stop airborne virus particles?
Ah, but just because the CDC admits it could work NOW doesn’t mean it worked BEFORE! I mean, the chemicals obviously magically changed when the CDC waved their wand of approval over the vat of HCQ!
/sarc
‘It defines misinformation as “false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.”’
And who defines “contemporary scientific consensus”? There exists no body in the country that makes such definitions. None in the world that I am aware of. That’s just not how the scientific process works.
Law is begging to be struck down as too vague to enforce.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.