Posted on 08/27/2022 12:56:51 AM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
What changed for the better after Poroshenko is less violations of ceasefire. They weren’t at the level of hot war before. His departure didn’t move the political solution one bit. It is now clear that the Ukrainian forces were forward-deployed to attack Donbas in March this year. Ze stated before that he is not going to comply with the accords.
Okay, Serbs were wrong in their genocide against Turks, “genocide” is always wrong, although this take ignores previous crimes against Serbs.
Was Ukraine right to attack Donbas in 2014 and deny them autonomy after ceasefire?
Counter battery fire is no fun, eh?
No they weren’t, and i wasn’t on Ukraine’s side in 2014.
Since 2019, things have been different, apart from some holdouts on all sides. Peace processes are naturally tough because of intransigence though... It’s no reason to throw in the towel and launch a military operation.
There were still skirmishes between paramilitaries for years after John Major kicked off peace talks. It was years before the loyalists disarmed fully. Even now there’s still the odd hardcore group trying to start the Troubles off. If we thought like Putin, we’d have funded the agitators and then invaded the Six Counties after a few years of de-escalation on the crap basis that a nonexistent genocide was about to kick off.
I think you are insincere or didn’t pay attention. Ze tried to proceed with Minsk very early and then got an astroturf riot from the American proxies. Then he converted to Nuland’s idea that amnesty for the rebels is impossible and no right to vote for Donbas because it is a Russian plot to break it away. There was nothing to talk about afterwards.
The very fact that Minsk was concluded puts a lie to your idea of Russian expansionism. Putin could have it all without a fight in 2014.
Your devotion to the will of the people is phony as well regarding Crimea where everybody and their dog don’t want to be a part of Ukraine.
“(also sponsored by Pfizer?)”
Since I don’t know much about this 92 year old man you have been maligning recently, I decided to check on this Pfizer factoid. I despise Pfizer and would not take an mRNA vaccine if I could possibly avoid it. It turns out that Soros dumped his Pfizer shares in 2017, well before the Covid, much less the vaccine issue, existed, not to mention the HCQ and Ivermectin controversies. So stop spreading this lie.
https://stockcircle.com/portfolio/george-soros/pfe/transactions
23 GEORGE SOROS PFIZER TRADES
“The first Pfizer trade was made in Q3 1999. Since then George Soros bought shares eleven more times and sold shares on fourteen occasions. The investor sold all their shares in Q2 2017 and doesn’t own any shares in Pfizer anymore.”
[You still haven’t shown any comments by me supporting Soros except to expose your lie/misinformation. Saying Soros supports Pfizer since he dropped his shares before we ever heard of Covid is like says Fauci is a really great guy. NOT.] Liar, liar, liar, doesn’t even know his pants are on fire. I wonder what he found out that made him pull out before we discovered how bad Pfizer was.
You post his propaganda, you post and support his agenda, you support him. You stop posting lies, lady.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.