Judge Concedes That Trump Affidavit May Be Heavily Redacted

US News ^ | 08/22/22 | Eric Tucker

[tennmountainman]

Of course.
He is a Liberal rat Federal magistrate.
Not even a real Federal Judge.
The Public and Trump have a right to
know why a Former President’s
Home was ransacked by 30 FBI agents.
The FBI has lied numerous times to spy on
Trump and his associates.
What are they lying about now?
The Public has a right to know.

[Recompennation]

I declare!

[ClearCase_guy]

I think they are supposed to protect "sources and methods" --

As in: "We received this information from John Smith, our chief spy in London, left the information at the usual drop-off spot at the Oliver Cromwell statue in Piccadilly."

Okay. I get it. Redact that stuff.

But I think a lot of these documents basically say, "Chris Wray said we'd all be fired if we didn't find a way to send Trump to prison, or at least get him convicted of some kind of felony."

That stuff should not be redacted. We deserve to see that.

[frank ballenger]

The names have been changed to protect the guilty.

Jack Webb would not have approved that.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Ala D3ershowitz is predicting that they government will try to redact anything that can help Trump and release only what makes him look bad. The FIB will object to much and only what is unchallenged by either party will be released. Basically all we will see Thursday is the name, address, and page number.

[AnthonySoprano]

.
The Epstein Magistrate is playing the game.

It’s run out the clock now.

Elections go by, new peeps are hired, new issues come to the fore…

[frank ballenger]

Redacted version....

FBI agents and their bosses could have gone to prison otherwise. Like the JFk items that cannot be revealed until the Kennedy children died or 50 years passed, the American people do not deserve the truth—this country does not belong to the American people. The Bush family, Cheneys and other elites know that.

If Trump didn’t make his own copies of the documents before that raid then it will be as bad as choosing Sessions and his early lawyers (Michael Cohen) to have his back.

[oil_dude]

Didn’t this fool (Rinehart) come out earlier this morning and say he didn’t want any of it redacted?

[Luke21]

They hide everything and act like they don’t and it’s big news.

[Revel]

USSC decisions can be leaked. Why not this?

[kiryandil]

“Juck the fudge, Boo-Boo!”

[flaglady47]

“This is the October surprise. Wait until Oct for headline redaction leaks to insinuate drama.”

My guess is the October surprise will be Donald J. Trump being indicted.

[kiryandil]

stopityerkillinme

[gw-ington]

The DoJ just publicly released the redacted affidavit about 10 minutes ago and it gives way more detail than I ever would have expected. Here it is:

/s

[Sarah Barracuda]

There are no allegations in the affidavit..the whole basis of the warrant who to steal back all of the documents that prove everything that Trump ever said was the TRUTH, from Russiagate on down the freakin line

[FreedomPoster]

My understanding is that this is the first page of the redacted affidavit, that someone let slip out:

[mykroar]

Actually this might just solidify the complete Stasi tactics being used here, for the few people that aren’t already outraged.

[granite]

“Much of the information being discussed is based on anonymous sources, speculation or hearsay; the government has not confirmed its accuracy,” Reinhart wrote.

[Dennis M.]

“Next time he needs to let it expire...like he should have done before.”

There is nothing patriotic about the act except to a fascist.