Skip to comments.
(NY) Landlords Would Be Fined $1000 For Checking Tenant Applicant Credit History
youtube.com ^
| 8/20/22
| Real Estate Investing and Landlord News
Posted on 08/20/2022 5:48:52 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU
A proposal by a New York politician was to fine Landlords $1000 if they check a tenant’s credit history during the application process. The politician believes that credit checks aren’t fair to tenants, however it never occurs to her that it isn’t fair to landlords to not have the opportunity to put the best possible tenants in their property.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bidenvoters; housing; landlords; newyork; ny; rent; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: AbolishCSEU
They want to drive private citizens away from being landlords.
61
posted on
08/20/2022 7:35:08 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: AbolishCSEU
“Again, ILLEGAL in NYS to charge any more than $20 for an app fee:”
Probably because it’s “racist”. Like the credit check, eviction and all the other rules screwing landlords in NY.
62
posted on
08/20/2022 7:36:30 AM PDT
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(I went to bed on November 3rd 2020 and woke up in 1984.)
To: AbolishCSEU
Meet the new landlord.
63
posted on
08/20/2022 7:37:07 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Brooklyn Attitude
64
posted on
08/20/2022 7:45:35 AM PDT
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: rbg81
Black rock, Blackstone, and Vanguard buy up all the property.
Market completely tanks.
Government takes all the property
Government turns property into section 8 housing.
Just a thought
65
posted on
08/20/2022 7:47:18 AM PDT
by
Keyhopper
(Indians had bad immigration laws)
To: I want the USA back
To: AbolishCSEU
What is the identity of this “New York politician”? Surely her momma gave her a name. Throw the communist out of office after a good tarring and feathering.
To: AbolishCSEU
Solution: charge a $1000 application fee and do the check anyway.
To: Alvin Diogenes
We shouldn’t fall for the idea that this is a case of renters vs. landlords; the actual contention is between “renters with good credit” vs. “renters with bad credit”.Sane rules keep rents reasonable for reasonable people... and higher for deadbeats. It's civilization affirmation...
69
posted on
08/20/2022 8:18:16 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The “threat to democracy” is shorthand for a threat to Democrats. -- Daniel Greenfield)
To: Disambiguator
Yep and hope you don’t rent to an activist. I refuse to rent to attorneys as they would be on the phone with AG Tish James in a heartbeat, who absolutely DESPISES landlors.
70
posted on
08/20/2022 8:18:36 AM PDT
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: Chewbarkah
71
posted on
08/20/2022 8:19:32 AM PDT
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: ridesthemiles
I’m guessing - and it’s just a guess - that most illegals will take good care of their ‘hotel rooms’. The “entitled” attitude is usually missing from those escaping third world hellholes. The biggest danger would come from some illegals deciding a room for 3 people can actually accommodate 20 people.
72
posted on
08/20/2022 8:22:22 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(The “threat to democracy” is shorthand for a threat to Democrats. -- Daniel Greenfield)
To: Gay State Conservative
How long does it take in NY to evict a person for non payment of rent? Three years? Four?
I know two people with rentals and it took three years to evict one and five years for the other.
Covid outbreak was right in the middle of all this, nevertheless ...
73
posted on
08/20/2022 8:25:07 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: ridesthemiles
OPENING the doors for all those Illegal Invaders ...
The millions being let in are going to be living somewhere. The left screams about needed more ‘low-income’ housing and we have millions coming in who are essentially no-income.
74
posted on
08/20/2022 8:46:34 AM PDT
by
hanamizu
To: AbolishCSEU
P.S. for those of you that dont’ know, they’ve already outlawed screening based on evictions (sealed these records) and now are getting ready to outlaw screening based on criminal activity.Question: If the landlord unknowingly rents to a predatory criminal, will he be liable for not properly screening his tenants? Seems like they're setting up a major Catch 22.
To: AbolishCSEU
Thanks. Michaella Solages. She looks exactly like the type that would push this. I wonder if she would support it if she had to personally guarantee the rent.
To: Pearls Before Swine
but of course the LL will be held liable. that way he can be permanently put out of business. They have a similar system in place since the 90’s in Rochester NY called “the point system.”
77
posted on
08/20/2022 10:02:47 AM PDT
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: AbolishCSEU
I was being tongue in cheek. The better solution is don’t be a landlord in areas with ridiculous regulations.
To: AbolishCSEU
I had to read through the comments in order to find the name of the Democrat in the NY State Assembly, who I assume is the one making this proposal. Her name is Michaelle C. Solages, representing the 22nd district which includes portions of the town of Hempstead in Nassau County on Long Island. She has been in the State Assembly since she was elected in 2012. She was 27 at the time. She is now 37. Her brother is a member of the Nassau County Legislature, and is running for Congress:
Michaelle C. Solages
Carrié Solages
Another family dynasty.
79
posted on
08/20/2022 11:01:51 AM PDT
by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
To: Disambiguator
We will be looking at Alabama property, one of the more pro private property rights states, in late February providing we still have a country left.
80
posted on
08/20/2022 11:15:30 AM PDT
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson