Posted on 08/19/2022 6:22:13 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
The deer would be less destructive to America.
100% taste better too...
You have to file a motion into an already existing case. Filing a motion means there’s already a case filed against Trump. Is there?
I didn’t know there was already a case filed against Trump related to the FBI raid. Is there?
If so, what are the charges?
Also does anyone know the Court case number?
The warrant is looking for evidence of criminal violations of the Espionage Act, among others.
If the GOP has a majority in the House, the first thing to do is impeach Merrick Garland.
Bacon wrapped filet on the grill…
The judge is connected to Epstein. He is a Deep State stooge.
-PJ
I doubt ANY Chief of Staff knows EVERYTHING a President is doing.
.
But that means that they received a complaint from a source. And if they’ve received a complaint then they’ve opened a criminal investigation.
If they did, messed up, but they can do that.
But the question remains, have they opened an official investigation? Have they stated that?
Who and when did the complaint concerning violations of the Espionage Act come about? It could be a snitch inside his detail or staff. Could be someone on his staff or security detail that the FBI compromised.
But at the end of the day, in order for that warrant to be legit in any sense, someone had to have said something.
Who is that person? What did they say? That’s what is in the affidavit.
And there’s the rub, right?
In the “actual” law, not the DOJ/FBI law, there needs to be a case.
What are the answers to the, 5 W’s?
“Everyone who has seen the picture of the judge getting a foot massage from Ghislaine Maxwell ...]
Does this picture exist? I think that would pretty much DESTROY everything that’s going on, in case the actual law won’t suffice.
What a clown show.
No charges have been filed.
He’s an American. He doesn’t stand a chance in a country full of courts run by Feral Jackass “judges”.
This says close to the mid terms.
You’re correct. So did Breitbart misstate Trump’s threat? For a motion, there must already be a case. But He could simply file His own case, not motion, claiming the search and seizure was a violation of His 4th amendment rights.
You’re correct. So did Breitbart misstate Trump’s threat? For a motion, there must already be a case. But He could simply file His own case, not motion, claiming the search and seizure was a violation of His 4th amendment rights.
Can he file a criminal complaint with local law enforcement for armed robbery? Is anything taken by the FBI that is not listed in the warrant stolen property?
I believe he can. But that’s small potatoes compared to 4th amendment violation which would make the whole thing an illegal search. That seems to be the claim, except they are calling it a motion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.