Skip to comments.
CDC ends recommendations for social distancing and quarantine for Covid-19 control, no longer recommends test-to-stay in schools
CNN ^
| August 11, 2022
| Brenda Goodman and Elizabeth Cohen
Posted on 08/11/2022 5:04:15 PM PDT by John W
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
08/11/2022 5:04:15 PM PDT
by
John W
To: John W
So was the CDC wrong all along?
Or was science wrong?
2
posted on
08/11/2022 5:07:04 PM PDT
by
cockroach_magoo
(“Sure we’ll have Fascism here, but it will come as an anti-Fascism movement.” - Huey Long)
To: John W
Just in time for the midterms!
What a bunch of maroons.
3
posted on
08/11/2022 5:08:39 PM PDT
by
Nathan _in_Arkansas
(Hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. )
To: John W
No longer a new disease the people’s bodies / immune systems are unfamiliar with.
Would have gotten to this point faster if Biden had implemented Operation Warp Speed II for treatments, but instead even stepped in and tried to stop states from doing this themselves.
To: cockroach_magoo
So was the CDC wrong all along? Or was science wrong? How do you come up with those questions in response to this information?
To: John W
I did all that stuff about 18 months ago
6
posted on
08/11/2022 5:11:34 PM PDT
by
bigbob
(z)
To: John W
7
posted on
08/11/2022 5:12:09 PM PDT
by
entropy12
(Trump pp& MAGA are the only way to keep USA viable.)
To: John W
Finally, and much belated.
Next time, let the states and each country decide for themselves, not CDD, WHO or CCP.
8
posted on
08/11/2022 5:12:20 PM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: John W
It’ll be fun to see who still runs around outside or alone in their car with their maks on.
9
posted on
08/11/2022 5:17:22 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Republican Wildcat
How do you come up with those questions in response to this information? If "science" demanded 6 feet of separation to limit transmission, then that guidance should apply until the virus is eradicated.
This was never about science, it was about a social and political risk assessment made by government entities and imposed upon us.
I accept that a risk assessment can change with time, but I will forever resent the notion that restrictions were imposed based on "science." Science and risk assessments are very different things, with different inputs and different implications.
10
posted on
08/11/2022 5:21:17 PM PDT
by
cockroach_magoo
(“Sure we’ll have Fascism here, but it will come as an anti-Fascism movement.” - Huey Long)
To: John W
"Just two weeks years to flatten the curve..."
11
posted on
08/11/2022 5:31:56 PM PDT
by
Gritty
(The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution. - Saul Alinsky)
To: John W
END THE MANDATES!!!!
12
posted on
08/11/2022 5:33:29 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! R)
To: John W
What would we ever do without the CDC to guide us?
To: John W
These dopes finally got a clue? It’s over, no one cares?
14
posted on
08/11/2022 5:37:28 PM PDT
by
jocon307
To: John W
15
posted on
08/11/2022 5:42:32 PM PDT
by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: cockroach_magoo
It was based on $cience
16
posted on
08/11/2022 5:43:55 PM PDT
by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: John W
People are still listening to the CDC?
I haven’t seen people social distancing in months and I go weeks now without seeing a mask.
17
posted on
08/11/2022 5:44:32 PM PDT
by
Allegra
To: John W
Nothing much has changed. The 6 ft rule was arbitrary but MAY have limited exposure in certain short term situation.
They STILL have not delineated how serious the preexisting conditions need to be for someone to be high risk. A blanket statement about diabetes doesn’t cover the range of disorder. Insulin dependant? Type 2? Long term.out of control? Newly diagnosed? Age stratification?
The CDC and NIH have been exposed as a very low quality advisory quantity.
Just now, they want to focus on treatment?
Harvard has a 50 bn dollar endowment. Stanford and Yale close to that.Where ere they? Why didn’t CDC and NIH call on them to help? Spit.
18
posted on
08/11/2022 5:44:59 PM PDT
by
Getready
(Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
To: John W
I presume they are doing this in a list minute attempt to curry favor, prior to the midterms - since most people hate these mandates.
I'm frankly surprised, I thought they'd zig in the other direction - impose more onerous shutdowns prior to the midterms so they can try to repeat their 2020 vote fraud scam... I'm not sure what is their game. I know its not based on altruism (nor "science", so-called). Maybe its just a feint before they unleash the next bug, and then run their shutdown scam again.
19
posted on
08/11/2022 6:06:19 PM PDT
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: John W
20
posted on
08/11/2022 6:22:25 PM PDT
by
444Flyer
(John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson