Posted on 08/03/2022 6:46:05 PM PDT by elpadre
There are at least two big missing pieces in the CHIPS Act of 2022, the US$52 billion subsidy for US-based semiconductor manufacturers that has just been sent to President Joe Biden for his signature.
The first missing piece is definitional. There is no statement in the Act of what constitutes an “advanced” semiconductor. Second, not only is there no priority on military capability, but there is also no requirement or guidance for protecting newly developed technology funded under the Act.
To begin with the question of what constitutes an “advanced” semiconductor, Intel is investing $20 billion in a new manufacturing facility, or fab, in Columbus, Ohio. The new plant intends to manufacture semiconductors with feature sizes of 5 nanometers (nm), smaller than the 14-nm used in most of today’s products; “advanced” chips are generally considered between 7-nm and 3-nm.
Intel made it clear that “no subsidy, no plant.”
Advanced chips with very small feature sizes offer very high performance and low power consumption. Computation-intensive applications, such as fast Fourier, transform iterations for submarine detection or high-speed calculations in artificial intelligence, cannot be achieved on slow general purpose processors.
China has already succeeded in making a basic chip at 7-nm, but assessments of the technology suggest it was done using older processes and the chip lacks some advanced features. It isn’t clear how quickly China will be able to sustain 7-nm chip production, though perhaps in a few years. If so, China could come online with commercial and military products even before the Intel facility is running in Ohio.
Most American companies, such as Intel and Nvidia, outsource their advanced chip production either to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) or Samsung in South Korea.
(Excerpt) Read more at asiatimes.com ...
excerpted:
“..Congress failed to prioritize American defense capabilities and create a mechanism to protect the critical technologies. The great risk is that the American investment in advanced microelectronics will end up fueling China’s rise, just as US stealth technology is now part of China’s jet fighter fleet...”
National suicide. Leave it up to the feckless government to bring us to this sad point.
They know they can get away with it. Who’s left to stop them?
The intent never was to actually produce electronic devices. The intent is just to spread money around to their friends and make some quick money off of insider trading.
That was one motive, sure - but it wasn’t the only one.
1. They wanted to be seen to be “Doing Something” while not actually doing anything to threaten their Chinese paymasters.
2. When somehow the act backfires, why, they can claim good intentions and blame it on others.
3. Meanwhile the country is now even weaker than before because US industry was expecting those chips and didn’t get them. The industry will source/move back offshore instead.
Yep. And this isn't the first time of course. Thinking of Solyndra here, but I'm sure FReepers have other examples.
Senator Schumer visits Corning Inc., talks semiconductors
Crony capitalism on steroids.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.