Posted on 07/31/2022 4:59:36 PM PDT by TBP
.
Another case to watch is Moore vs. Harper from NC. The USSC has just accepted this case.
From The Guardian (of all places):
Could the US Supreme Court give state legislatures unchecked election powers?
somebody has been listening
Handy little text tool.
Paste ALL CAPS TITLE, click Capitalize, copy results.
Such as re-running the election in November, according to the laws in effect at the time.
The Dems would soil themselves.
Or they could invalidate the 31 states who changed their laws. But then would the House and Senate have to reconvene to count electors again? Hard to say. Asking for the election to be re-run would be easier.
Does anyone really believe that the powers that be will allow the Supreme Court justices to NOT follow their bidding? John Roberts sole job is to make sure they do and all the while make it all look legit. Wink wink.
Why are they dealing with this issue now, but not before the election and after it?
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.Someone should challenge those states with midnight dumps of mysterious ballots, that the Congressional districts where those midnight dumped ballots flipped the vote count, that those Congressional districts should lose their representation in the current Congress.
Make SCOTUS hear a 14th amendment Section 2 challenge.
-PJ
The justices failed. They failed their integrity, responsibility, and duty. They failed the American People, the USA, and themselves.
Had the Supreme Court been represented by people of courage, responsibility, integrity, and moral and intellectual clarity, justice would have been served, truth exposed, and the American People spared immeasurable danger, hardship, uncertainty, corruption, injustice, and untruth.
The justices who failed America stand in shame before history and all the world.
They also stand in shame before God.
May they listen to Him sufficiently to take action to correct their misguided decision not to examine the evidence of massive fraud, and to seek truth and justice on this matter, even at this late date.
We’re post Constitution now, fuhgeddaboudit
Did the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction over any of the matters you refer to as being “brought before them”?
“The wheels of Justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.”
Unless you steal an election, or are Hillary. Or Alec Baldwin. Or...
Keep the FAITH, Baby! Wisconsin outlawed Drop Boxes. One step closer!
I’m wondering if anyone involved in ‘The Steal’ wakes up in a cold sweat thinking, ‘Sheet! We REALLY overplayed our hand THIS time! Who in their right mind would believe ‘Basement Dweller Joe’ would get 81 MILLION votes by morning when they went to bed with a Trump Victory?’
Yeah. I doubt it, too.
"On December 14, 2020, the 401 unconstitutionally appointed and 137 constitutionally appointed Electors cast their votes at the Electoral College for President and Vice President.”The casting of votes by unconstitutionally appointed Electors raises a question that certainly comes into the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court has assumed the authority to interpret the Constitution since the beginning of the USA, and nothing is more important to the interpretation of the Constitution than fair and honest elections.
They ducked on this one the same as they ducked on Obama’s ineligibility.
The constitution gives virtually total control over elections to the states. The constitution says nothing about cheating or what should happen if it occurs. So, unless you want a Supreme Court that just makes up powers it doesn’t have, you should focus on the states that cheated.
So how do you propose these two men get around the kangaroo assertion that they lack standing?
Of course it was all corrupt, but that’s not going to make Trump president.
Let’s see. Latches, check. Relief requested impossible, check. Standing, check. And many more reasons to duck dealing with constitutional claims.
Raskin’s complaint is so funny. The constitution specifically places the legislatures in the drivers seat for elections, thus the complaint that “voters are at the mercy of the legislatures, (paraphrasing), is so disingenuous.
This Supreme Court challenge never went anywhere because nobody in a position of authority to represent a state legislature or a state executive branch office ever challenged the "illegal" election procedures.
I would highly recommend reading the public letter issued by Sen. Tom Cotton in advance of the January 6th, 2021 joint session of Congress. He explained why he would not vote to uphold any objections to the certified electoral votes that had been sent to Congress by the various states. His explanation was perfectly clear, and it reflected exactly what I posted above. All he wanted was a single official communication from any given state legislature or executive branch official who was authorized to speak on behalf of the state in question, and he would have recognized that as a legitimate reason to uphold an objection.
No such communication was ever sent to anyone in Congress before January 6, 2021.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.