The story behind an incredibly heated, important and strange GOP primary election in Racine County (WI Speaker Vos primary)

Journaltimes.com ^ | 7/31/22 | Adam Rogan

[cotton1706]

ROCHESTER — The Republican primary in Assembly District 63 is heated, engaging, important, confusing and downright strange.

A former president has gotten involved. So has a former green beret tied to spreading falsehoods that fueled the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol riot. There have been three “debates” with only one candidate in attendance. A Racine County activist being investigated for election fraud is deeply involved in the challenger’s campaign. And seemingly every home from Burlington to Union Grove has a sign in the front yard, supporting one candidate or the other.

This is all for a partisan primary, with two candidates from the same party whose political opinions seemingly overlap most of the time.

Robin Vos is facing the possibility that his political career could receive a deathblow next week. He has no plans to hang up his political cleats so soon, but Adam Steen wants to force Wisconsin’s most powerful conservative into an early retirement from the state legislature.

The winner of the Aug. 9 election will almost certainly win the two-year term up for grabs. The Democrats don’t even have a nominee in the district.

[cotton1706]

Like Speaker Rusty Bowers in Arizona, Speaker Vos is a corrupt tool.

Imagine defeating TWO state Speakers of the House within one week (Bowers is term-limited out of the AZ House and is running for state Senate).

[Flick Lives]

The bias downright drips from this article. The powers that be want to continue to be.

[ballplayer]

What court has heard any case of voter fraud?

[DallasBiff]

There is a thread on FR with a twitter video of what is a “mobile” dropbox in Racine.

[RideForever]

What court has heard any case of voter fraud?

Better question is, what court can rule on election fraud, given the plenary powers of Congress and the state legislatures.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

(BP...Your "What court has heard any case of voter fraud?")

If you bring up a case for potential voter fraud before the election its "Not Ripe". If you bring it up after the election, laches...You waited too long! PA Supreme court ruling on 2020 election fraud. If they cheart they only cheat where the AG is a Soros sponsored AG, so, "No, not widespread, no evidence, nothing to see!" So it does not even make it to a court.

And of course the Supreme Courts decided to not take up the Challenge by the Attornies General for Texas and other states to the Fraudulent election results before January 6, the only time other states could challenge the widespread fraud by Ds.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3971741/posts

Someone Kept track of these things. I think a lower level GA Court made some rulings on Fulton County GA but was it was overturned. Stacy Abrams Sister-Judge is running interference for the "Big-Cheat". I know that a D Mayor in Texas has been convicted of ballot bundling. Others have too, but these are all page 14 type paragraphs announcing a conviction.

Off to mow the lawn my anger-energy to good use.

[kiryandil]

I think a lower level GA Court made some rulings on Fulton County GA but was it was overturned.

Georgia stooge-judge Brian Amero strung the case along for months before he stuck it to the plaintiff.

Georgia ballot inspection case dismissed after no fraud found (huh?!)
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | October 13, 2021 | Mark Neisse
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4003266/posts

A judge dismissed a lawsuit Wednesday by election skeptics who sought to inspect absentee ballots from last year’s presidential election, a decision that came a day after Georgia election investigators told the court they were unable to find any counterfeit ballots. Superior Court Judge Brian Amero ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue, bringing the case to a close and keeping Fulton County’s 147,000 original absentee ballots under seal. The judge’s order is the latest in a series of decisions against supporters of Republican President Donald Trump who have asked the courts to help them pursue suspicions of fraud or reverse the results of the election.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Your "What court has ruled on it."

Posted by FRs Number One Pal on Telegram and probably somewhere on Freerepublic.

https://issuesinsights.com/2022/08/01/a-declaration-of-dissolution-wisconsin-supreme-court-fires-the-starting-gun/

Wisconsin Supreme Court says:

“If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful, and their results are illegitimate.” — Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley, writing for the Wisconsin Supreme Court majority in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

But again, per Wisconsin’s Supremes, Donald Trump didn’t have to prove the existence or extent of fraud, only deviation from legislative schemes. Because – nota bene! – the votes’ unlawful nature is the proof.

The same “pollution” of the “integrity of the results,” as the Court expressed it, occurred in:

Michigan: Unlawfully imposed rules for validating absentee signatures and a refusal to comply with an enactment allowing access to drop-box video surveillance.

Georgia: The Stacey Abrams settlement that, as a U.S. Supreme Court amicus curiae brief demonstrated, ran afoul of schemes regulating – what else? – drop boxes and signature identification.

Pennsylvania: A state Supreme Court decree involving absentee deadlines that, per U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, “squarely alter(ed) an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature.”

As Texas and 17 other states argued in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, these jurisdictions’ “significant and unconstitutional irregularities … cumulatively preclude(d) knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election.”

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

(Posted by number one pal on Telegram 9:16PM (and maybe FR.)

Wisconsin Supreme Court says:

“If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful, and their results are illegitimate.” — Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley, writing for the Wisconsin Supreme Court majority in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

https://issuesinsights.com/2022/08/01/a-declaration-of-dissolution-wisconsin-supreme-court-fires-the-starting-gun/

But again, per Wisconsin’s Supremes, Donald Trump didn’t have to prove the existence or extent of fraud, only deviation from legislative schemes. Because – nota bene! – the votes’ unlawful nature is the proof.

The same “pollution” of the “integrity of the results,” as the Court expressed it, occurred in:

Michigan: Unlawfully imposed rules for validating absentee signatures and a refusal to comply with an enactment allowing access to drop-box video surveillance.

Georgia: The Stacey Abrams settlement that, as a U.S. Supreme Court amicus curiae brief demonstrated, ran afoul of schemes regulating – what else? – drop boxes and signature identification.

Pennsylvania: A state Supreme Court decree involving absentee deadlines that, per U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, “squarely alter(ed) an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature.”

As Texas and 17 other states argued in a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, these jurisdictions’ “significant and unconstitutional irregularities … cumulatively preclude(d) knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election.”

Yet observers left and right shrug off the Badger State ruling’s significance. Slate sniffs, “Without a shred of evidence” (to repeat, irrelevant) “the court has thrown its weight behind a dangerous conspiracy theory” (unlawful votes are no “conspiracy”) “that helped to fuel the Jan. 6 insurrection.” (That again.)

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

See post 8

[kiryandil]

Thanks, Pete!  

[Diana in Wisconsin]

“Robin Vos is facing the possibility that his political career could receive a deathblow next week.”

Lord? Hear. Our. Prayer! He’s a douche in the same mold as Paul Ryan.

Ugh! “Out! Out, damn spot!”

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

When its over find the Mobile Voting Bus that apparently shuttles between Madison and Racine and send it pick him up and return him to Chicago!

Like it says, Trump does not need to prove fraud, the irregular nature of the election is the proof!

[numberonepal]

Fraud vitiates everything.

[MayflowerMadam]

“Fraud vitiates everything.”

If only...

SCOTUS believed that in the past. Now they ignore it.