Posted on 07/25/2022 4:29:48 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
A Fleetwood PA man could face more than three years in prison after pleading guilty to charges related to the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
Alan Byerly, 55, entered a guilty plea today in federal court to two charges: assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers and assault by striking, beating and wounding.
The attorney for the U.S. government once again presented evidence they said they could prove in court if the case had gone to trial.
Byerly did take some issue with the details regarding the incident with a taser-like device.
"The part about pointing at the officers, I actually held it upwards," he said. "I did not point it at 'em."
When asked by the judge, Byerly said he was high school educated and had not previously received any mental health treatment.
He initially pleaded not guilty in November after he was charged in September with multiple offenses, including assault.
Authorities say Byerly, who was seen wearing a Kutztown beanie hat and carrying a Taser-like device, assaulted police officers and a news photographer amid the chaos on Capitol Hill.
According to the judge at the hearing, Byerly could face more than three years behind bars and be forced to pay thousands in restitution.
(Excerpt) Read more at wfmz.com ...
Stevee colbert’s minions for same offense——meh! 😡
Our two-tiered “justice” system at work.
I like to think I would serve the time.
But then I am not him
Ping
I’m sure the DOJ was his best new buddy until he found out they are allowed to lie to you. Encouraged to actually.

Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
It is not clear if he actually “assaulted” them in the ordinary understanding of that term. Is displaying a taser, now “assault”? Or did he actually strike them?
I am sick of hearing these POS’s saying jan 6 riot. Show me anything that shows that was a riot. Compare it to blm or antifa “protests”. A blind man can see it was a set up by capitol police and lots of others!
Assault, as defined by the law, is a reasonable concern of physical harm. There doesn’t actually have to be any harm for one to be charged.
Somebody who uses intimidation tactics, like entering your physical space can be charged with assault, even if he actually doesn’t touch you.
Should have just burned a town down.
D I S G U S T I N G
physical space
/*
What the he’ll is that ?
Or is it like gender ? Fluid and variable .
What? 1 foot, 5 feet, eye shot , ear shot ?
Striking, beating, wounding...rather different from the majority arrested.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.