Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What it would mean for Biden to declare a national climate emergency
Yahoo News via Currently ^ | July 20, 2022 | Ben Adler

Posted on 07/20/2022 4:21:59 AM PDT by John W

In the wake of Sen. Joe Manchin’s announcement that he won’t vote for a bill addressing climate change unless inflation slows next month, climate leaders are calling for President Biden to declare climate change a national emergency — and it appears that the White House is seriously considering the move.

A formal declaration would open up new possibilities for unilateral action by the executive branch to combat climate change, including halting U.S. exports of crude oil and halting offshore drilling. Biden could even redirect military funding to the construction of renewable energy projects — much as former President Donald Trump diverted more than $18 billion in Pentagon funding to build a wall on the U.S. border with Mexico — and impose trade penalties on countries that permit deforestation, such as the destruction of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil.

But such a creative use of the relevant federal law would also undoubtedly trigger lawsuits from fossil fuel companies and Republicans.

U.S. presidents have declared 60 national emergencies since 1976, according to the think tank Demos. Historically, those have typically been for acute crises, such as specific natural disasters, rather than a long-term predicament like climate change.

In an era of increased partisan polarization and congressional gridlock, however, pushing the boundaries of executive action is becoming more common. Trump, for instance, declared illegal migration across the southern border a national emergency so he could use funds that Congress appropriated for the military to build a border wall, a move the Supreme Court upheld in 2019.

In theory, such a precedent would bode well for a climate emergency declaration, but one cannot assume too much consistency from a court that has also become more partisan and seen fit to limit the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency to enforce the Clean Air Act.

(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climateemergency
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2022 4:21:59 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John W

President Retard is simply bypassing the law as usual 🤪


2 posted on 07/20/2022 4:24:51 AM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Who knows? Maybe eating food and drinking water and living in a house, and owning a car, will be prohibited


3 posted on 07/20/2022 4:26:02 AM PDT by Mark17 (Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

We should live in caves and eat nuts and berries and get the national population down below 50 million. It’s for the children.


4 posted on 07/20/2022 4:27:54 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (We are already in a revolutionary period, and the Rule of Law means nothing. It's "whatever".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John W

Emergency based on what exactly.


5 posted on 07/20/2022 4:28:40 AM PDT by MomwithHope (Forever grateful to all our patriots, past, present and future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Insane concept.


6 posted on 07/20/2022 4:30:28 AM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

We have millions of illegals streaming across the border, but the weather is going to kill us?

Fossil fuels didn’t try to freeze me to death in Feb 21. A lack of fossil fuels did.


7 posted on 07/20/2022 4:30:43 AM PDT by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MomwithHope

“Emergency based on what exactly?”

Poor planning on their part doesn’t necessitate an emergency on our part.


8 posted on 07/20/2022 4:32:31 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (DJT24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John W

What would it mean?? It would mean the media would eventually have to start admitting his JA numbers are in the single digits.


9 posted on 07/20/2022 4:32:45 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Previous published documents from these psychopaths is that they desire a planet with fewer than 500 million. 50 million, I think it could be argued, would be on par with an extinction event.


10 posted on 07/20/2022 4:37:57 AM PDT by rarestia (“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” -Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John W

This aint his idea. None of his decisions are his own..oh, except his own decision to constantly make an ass out of himself.


11 posted on 07/20/2022 4:38:25 AM PDT by know.your.why (If you dont watch the MSM you are uninformed. If you do watch the MSM you are misinformed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Well, whether they say it or not, I am sure someone is thinking of population reduction. What a bunch of skanks.


12 posted on 07/20/2022 4:38:41 AM PDT by Mark17 (Retired USAF air traffic controller. Father of USAF pilot. USAF aviation runs in the family )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John W

climate emergency is another way to control you like the scamdemic


13 posted on 07/20/2022 4:39:02 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

I’ve laughed at these fools since the first Earth Day.

It’s accepted (or, it used to be acknowledged) that whether it’s happening or not, there’s NOTHING we can to to stop it.

On the other hand, the now destroyed Georgia Guidestones said we should limit population to 500,000. That leaves a lot of extra bug eaters among us.


14 posted on 07/20/2022 4:39:11 AM PDT by Not_Who_U_Think
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Maybe this is just a desperate measure to hide Joke Biden forever and never let him show his face again.

“He stays in the White House and has turned off all the cameras to reduce his carbon footprint.”

15 posted on 07/20/2022 4:45:23 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

I think it should mean NO air conditioning in government buildings during the summer. During the winter government buildings should be heated to a maximum of 55 degrees. There should be a firm carbon limit based on a average American household use. When you reach this carbon limit - no more carbon for you. The rich couldn’t buy carbon credits to get around this limit - they would only get up to the limit. John Kerry’s private jets would set idle and he would only be able to heat or cool a small portion of one of his mansions. This might be drastic - but WE ARE TRYING TO SAVE THE PLANET!

We should also have an electric vehicle fair share act that would tax electric vehicle owners for using public roads. They don’t pay a gas tax to maintain the roads. They need to pay their fair share,


16 posted on 07/20/2022 4:52:09 AM PDT by TN4Trump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Let’s start with eliminating the 81 million Democrats that voted for Joey Crappy Pants. They are useless eaters, breathers and breeders. Do it for the Earf!!!


17 posted on 07/20/2022 4:55:26 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: John W
"What it would mean for Biden to declare a national climate emergency"

The suspension of the Bill of Rights until the national climate emergency is over.

18 posted on 07/20/2022 5:02:23 AM PDT by Carl Vehse (A proud member of the LGBFJB community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

Its got my vote.


19 posted on 07/20/2022 5:06:30 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: John W

It means that enforcement is soon to follow.

This time with a virtual iron boot, and maybe some street riots for show.


20 posted on 07/20/2022 5:06:39 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson