Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. Department of Education Releases Proposed Changes to Title IX Regulations, Invites Public Comment
https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-releases-proposed-changes-title-ix-regulations-invites-public-comment ^

Posted on 07/13/2022 4:52:05 PM PDT by cuz1961

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Kindergarten through college.

Now I hear the progs are trying to back door title 9 by making sexual preference a protected civil right.

( this is a particularly evil bait and switch duel use scam attempt. )

They are attempting to use the dept of education agency.... ,, to declare regulations within schools ,,,for a protected civil right ,,,,sans legislation ,,, to sexual preference.,,,,, .

1. It gets men in school locker rooms and sports.

2. It grants students ( even minor students) sexual preference civil rights. ,, Defacto sexual consent civil right for children.

Boom, backdoor ground up legalized pedosexualism.

I can’t beleive the warroom missed this.

And here is the guy they've picked to do this..

Entergy diversity officer to lead expanded LSU office dedicated to Title IX, civil rights

https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/education/article_1de82382-02db-11ed-9a46-fb4fc3c3fea0.amp.html

.. . "When I look at the office of inclusion, civil rights and Title IX, bringing these three components together really makes sense," Manuel said. "It makes sense because the common thread that runs through all three of these offices and that's equity."

...

1 posted on 07/13/2022 4:52:05 PM PDT by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

correction

This is just the guy at LSU,,

But it also says

“Todd brings the leadership and experience needed to ....
...
..build a true national model ....
.
for an integrated approach for inclusion, civil rights and Title IX.”


2 posted on 07/13/2022 4:53:26 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

no enumerated power for this agency to even exist


3 posted on 07/13/2022 4:56:07 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

And as the PHD said to Hawley

Speaking against , is violence.

So we won’t even be allowed to say a child does not have a civil right to sexual preference/activity ya pervs.


4 posted on 07/13/2022 4:57:58 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961
I will wait response until the US Dept of Education allows and encourages
women to urinate in the men's room, and
has urinals in the womens room.

5 posted on 07/13/2022 4:58:17 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961
STRAIGHT UP CHILD ABUSE.

ARREST ALL of the progressive leftist BASTARDS AND B*TCHES who promote this GARBAGE.

6 posted on 07/13/2022 5:00:07 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4078138/posts

Questioning if men can have babies ‘opens up trans people to violence’: UC Berkeley professor


7 posted on 07/13/2022 5:00:24 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Does this mean saying Girls have cooties in the third grade will get you expelled?

Just draw a picture of a gun and shoot me.


8 posted on 07/13/2022 5:02:26 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Back to kangaroo courts where an accusation alone is treated as proof of guilt and the guy gets punished for it. Back to no opportunity to confront your accuser, no evidence required to support the accusations etc.

Yet another thing to be reversed 180 degrees on day one of the 2nd Trump administration.


9 posted on 07/13/2022 5:02:44 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

https://www.law.berkeley.edu/php-programs/courses/coursePage.php?cID=30773

This seminar explores Reproductive Justice (“RJ”) as a paradigm for understanding reproductive oppression - that is, the subordination of individuals through their bodies, sexualities, and abilities to reproduce. The RJ paradigm picks up where a reproductive rights framework ends. It contends that the fight for equality and dignity in matters relating to reproduction continues beyond a successful argument that the Constitution ought to protect a “right” to privacy, “right” to access contraception, or “right” to an abortion. An RJ framework observes that “rights” are given meaning - and lose meaning - according to the race, class, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, immigration status, and physical and mental ability (among other attributes) of the rights bearer. As such, RJ analyzes reproductive experiences within a complex context and with respect to the multiple statuses of the persons involved. Upon successful completion of this course, students should be able to analyze social issues through an RJ lens and develop legal and non-legal strategies for addressing these issues.


10 posted on 07/13/2022 5:14:40 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

This is discrimination against men.


11 posted on 07/13/2022 5:16:09 PM PDT by alternatives? (The only reason to have an army is to defend your borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Department of Education.
A collection of misfits, little toads, turds, and losers.
Get rid of them. To mimic Emperor Palpatine, “Wipe them out, all of them.”
Rememer, it’s your children. The death of a collection of low-IQ losers is a mere blip in time.


12 posted on 07/13/2022 5:17:17 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Pursuant to the 10th Amendment the Department of Education should be closed permanently.

Trump should file legislation to this effect before he sits down following his swearing in ceremony.

I thought Betsy Devos would take at least a few baby steps in the direction of closing. To mine and I’m sure millions of others dismay, she didn’t do a damn thing.


13 posted on 07/13/2022 5:18:44 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

https://rumble.com/v1c0rfr-josh-hawley-sets-trap-sits-back-and-lets-woke-witness-fall-right-into-it.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=BonginoReport&ep=2


14 posted on 07/13/2022 5:43:19 PM PDT by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

There is nothing in the Constitution that gives the federal government ANY power to run education

Just because Jimmy Carter decided to create a Department of Education does not give the federal government the power to do so.


15 posted on 07/13/2022 5:44:58 PM PDT by Maceman (People who vote Democrat sell their lives (and ours) to the government and their souls to the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

We have laws on the books for all this stuff and don’t need new or more laws for schools. If you are sexually harassed in K-whatever, you have laws for that and are protected. Never ever let the schools dictate these things, ever!!


16 posted on 07/13/2022 5:50:08 PM PDT by JoJo354 (Pray for our nation! It needs it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alternatives?

What are “men”?

I’m not a biologist.


17 posted on 07/13/2022 5:50:42 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JoJo354

More laws just for having more laws really only benefits those who administer them and those who try to find clients to sue over them.


18 posted on 07/13/2022 5:54:12 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

All Republicans have to do is make a commercial, with several girls who’ve lost races to pretending AKA transgender women and/or girls who’ve lost scholarships to pretend women. End ad with, ‘This is what democrats want to impose onto you and your children. VOTE REPUBLICAN!’


19 posted on 07/13/2022 6:26:49 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

How can they protect women when they can’t even define what a woman is?


20 posted on 07/13/2022 6:32:18 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every leftist is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson